|
HEAR O ISRAEL, WE I AM GODS ARE ONE |
Monotheistic emphasis of the Old
Testament is based on the Shema of Deut 6:4
ELOHIM
The very first verse in the Bible begins with the word Elohim as God
which is plural in usage. The Shema also uses the same word. The use
of the plural 'Elohim' for God, instead of the singular 'El' has
remained a problem all through history..
This has been generally explained as
a 'plural of majesty' or 'singular of intensity'. In most cultures
Kings and Religious authorities do use the plural in denoting themself.
This is not to imply that they are a complex beings in themselves, but
that they represent many. Kings are representatives of people and
Priests are representatives of believers before God. So when they
speak on that capacity the plurals are used. But we cannot justify God
in using the plural term while revealing himself to his creation. God
is not representing the creation nor creatures, unless we support the
Advaitic thought.
The word for God in the singular
sense is El which is used most often in describing Gods
characteristics or attributes such as El Elyon, El Shaddai etc.
EHAD
The word used in the shema for "one"
again denotes a "composite unity". There are two words for 'one' in
Biblical Hebrew: 'Ehad' indicating a composite unity i.e. one
made up of many parts, and "yahidh" indicating a strictly
monistic oneness. Shema however do not use the former indicating
plurality within the unity. This is again upheld by checking with
other passages where ehad being used.
Gen 2.24--the man and his wife will
be one (ehad) flesh.
Man and women are certainly two persons with two seperate bodies and
here they become one (ehad) flesh.
Ex 26:6, 11--the fifty gold clasps
are used to hold the curtains together so that the tent would be a
unit (ehad).
Here we have several distinct curtains forming a unit of one tent
using fifty gold clasp.
2 Samuel 2:25--many soldiers made
themselves into 'one group' (ehad)
The army is a unity consisting of many soldiers.
Gen 34:16 --the men of Shechem
suggest intermarriage with Jacob's children in order to become 'one(ehad)
people'.
Here two communities join together to form one people.
In these contexts the statement of
Shema is an assertion of unity of Godhead amidst plurality and not the
other way round.
Then we have usage of "us" when god
speaks in the passages Gen 1.26, 3:22, 11.7; Is 6.8.
Gen 1.26: Then God said, "Let us make
man in our image, in our likeness,
Notice "Us" enhanced and supported by "Our" Man is created
in God's likeness. How was this likeness reflected in man? This is
stated in
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he
created him; male and female he created them.
Male and female persons is the image of God. Male and Female are two
different persons. God's image is that these two are one. Only at
the fall of man this image was broken when male and female asserted
their seperateness and domination of one over the other came into
existence. As Adam represents the completeness of man (Adam means
mankind), Adam within himself was both male and female forming the
Unity. It was this unity that was seperated by God at the seperation
of Eve. Only after the seperation was creation possible. It is the
plurality within the God head that is the start of all creaton. Until
then God was inactive and simply self-existed. That is why the Gen
1:1 emphasizes the Elohim God. And we do see the three persons of
Trinity at the creation right at verse 1.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface
of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the
waters.3 And God said, (The Word of God)
Rabbi's recognized that Gen 1.26 was
a support for the plurality of God. In the Midrash Rabbah on Genesis;
Rabbi Samuel bar Nahman in the name of Rabbi Jonathan says that , that
at the time when Moses wrote the Torah he was writing a portion of it
daily. But when he came to this verse which says, "And Elohim said
let us make man in our image after our likeness," Moses said, Master
of the Universe why do you give an excuse to the sectarians to
emphazise plurality within you? God answered to
Moses, "You write and whoever wants to err let him err." In other
words, Moses was particularly instructed to maintain this plurality
form specifically. If that is the case, who is actually erring from
the truth?
Then when we come to the story of
fall:
Gen 3.22: And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of
us,
The problem here is again the plural use of "us". To whom is God
speaking. If the plurality was a monistic oneness, there is no one
else God could identify as us. The sentence clearly defines a God
class or God community. Again unless we assume a Gnostic God, we have
no other choice than to fall back to a plural organically united God.
The same usage is again appear in
Gen 11.7: Come, let us go down and
confuse their language
and in
Is 6.8: Then I heard the voice of the
Lord saying, "Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?"
Thus the plural name Elohim and the
possibility of multiple personality within the class of Elohim are
probably implied. God being totally other we cannot know the essence
of God or his nature in their absolute. Yet God has graciously
revealed himself to us and that is all what we know of God. So for
confirmation of Trinity - three persons in one Essence we need to look
into the revelation of God in history. This is what we attempt in the
next two chapters. |