|
MECHANISTIC
VIEW OF COSMOS AND PREDESTINATION
-
In this article I
am trying to show that the concepts developed in
Calvinism were the product of the society and the
philosophy of the period. The onus of the
Renaissance was to bring everything into a law and
order under a sovereign unified system, which is
monistic and predetermined. As you can see from the
analysis below this concept of government runs
through not only science and theology but also in
all avenues of human thought of the period. It was
the reflection of the social and historical state of
the European world at that period of time.
|
Science |
Model
|
The Concept |
Physical
Science
|
Sir Isaac
Newton (1642-1727)
and
The Mechanical Model of Universe. |
Cosmos
consists of matter in motion. There is an
inviolable law behind the working of the cosmos
that every thing right from elementary atoms to
the galaxies obeys them. We can predict the
state of the cosmic to the very detail if we can
understand these rules. Once the rules are
known, given any state of the cosmos at any
particular instant, its state at any other time
can be exactly and completely predicted. Since
God is the creator of the cosmos and since God
is the one who subjected the cosmos under the
laws, God not only can know (Foreknowledge) but
has actually Ordained and Predestined everything
even before the creation of the universe.
Newtonian physics does something else as well.
It externalizes time. Time becomes a coordinate
with which to measure things; it's taken away
from the events that are taking place in time.
Time became a coordinate normal to space. It
exists beyond matter and events. So a God who is
beyond time could see time from beginning to end
as on a graph. The predominant mechanistic view
of nature is not restricted to science alone. It
is not only reflected in religion but also in
all spheres of human endeavor. It becomes the
philosophy of the age. Human mind can understand
only in terms of similarities and differences.
There is nothing new under the sun. Special
relativity's time as a fourth dimension only
enhanced this concept. But the unity of time and
space do give problems to the classical
Newtonian concept as it does to Calvinian
concept of God.
|
Biological
and Genetic Sciences
|
Charles
Darwin (1809-1882)
and
Biological
Evolution |
The next step
in this philosophical development came with the
Theory of Evolution as proposed by Darwin. He
tried to explain changes or movement as a
necessity imposed on organism by their
environment. In order to survive they adopted to
their surroundings by the force of natural laws.
He actually gave the organism a mind to vary and
that intelligently without intelligence. If they
changed intelligently by developing complicated
systems it was simply a natural law. The
development of genetic science evolved to
explain the absolutes behind the reality in
terms of the genes. What happens is simply the
rearrangement of the genes. By a manipulation of
dominant genes and dormant genes and probability
calculation even the evolutionary changes were
brought under absolutes.
When
biologists talk about dividing the world into
the organism and the environment, we have to
reply that there is a very intimate
interpenetration of organism and environment.
Organisms transform their environment, they
define their environment, they create
environments, and they are environments for each
other. Each part of the organism is environment
for other parts, and so on. By looking at the
interpenetration of these objects we get a much
more profound understanding of the world than by
making a separation. If a true understanding of
the cosmos and its relation to God is to be
understood it must be as an interaction and not
as something simply predetermined and work like
a clock. But when God is outside of this
equation this will not be acceptable. Even the
coming of God into history has become
meaningless when it serves no specific purpose.
He refuses to react with the environment by
refusing to form part of the whole. |
History and
Culture
|
George W. F.
Hegel (1770-1831)
Dialectics of
Mind |
- For Hegel in true
classical fashion of philosophy
considers that only the mind is real.
All other external realities are
constructs of the mind. We cannot
control history or culture. Hence we
have no responsibility. The mind is
simply in control and we follow it.
|
Economics and
Social Sciences
|
Karl Marx
(1818-1883)
Dialectical
and
Historical
Materialism |
- Karl Marx put Hegel
upside down and considers that matter
and motion are the only realities.
Matter proceeds in dialectical fashion,
starting with a thesis developing within
it an antithesis and a synthesis emerges
and the whole process repeats itself. He
applied his dialectical materialism to
history and developed his Historical
Materialism to explain history and human
development. He explained the
development of history through Primitive
Communism to Feudalism to Capitalism
through the dialectics of class
struggle. We cannot determine our class.
But our class determines our character,
behavior and state.
Like
Christians, Marx believed that history is
predestined in its course of development (not by
virtue of God’s predestination – but virtue of
the direction of dialectics within capitalism)
to be a Casteless Classless Society (Marxian
Heaven). Nothing can prevent it from being
realized. On the other hand every person can
cooperate in bringing it into existence sooner.
We can delay its appearance by opposing it and
can hasten it by supporting it.
One can see
why I consider Marxism as a Christian heresy. It
also explains why Marxism is powerful in
Christian dominated areas of the third world. |
Psychology
|
Sigmund
Freud(185-1939) |
Sigmund Freud
extended this mechanical model to the field of
Psychology. According to Freud subconscious mind
controls everything. We cannot directly control
the sub conscious. But it controls us totally.
The main force which controls the subconscious
is libido the sex energy (in Hinduism this
theory is called Kundalini) |
Behaviorism
|
B. F. Skinner
(1904- ) |
- Skinner applied the
same principles to human behavior. We
are conditioned by our environment to
behave in a certain way to our external
stimuli. We are thus fully controlled
and formed by our environment. Freedom
in its absolute sense does not exist, as
we cannot control our environment enough
to make any effect to feed back on our
behavior.
|
It is not difficult to
find Calvinism was a reinterpretation of Historical
Christianity in terms of the philosophies of the period.
It also reflected the social structure of the time. The
dominant social system of the period was Feudalism
breaking down to give way to monopoly Capitalism. The
ideal feudalism was with a sovereign who controls all
the Lords with their provinces effectively. No wonder
God is seen as a Sovereign King. Lords were free men who
could indulge in the luxuries of the world without limit
as long as he remained loyal to the sovereign. As for
the serfs and the slaves who were not free, they were
justly condemned to their eternal doom without
remission. All these concepts were mercilessly
transferred into theological content of the period my
Calvin and Luther. In Capitalistic thought pattern, the
Sovereign Kingship is simply replaced with Monopoly
Capitalist.
As we see people were
considered as equivalent massive bodies. The essential
difference between consciousness (personality) and the
material world is in the freedom of the consciousness to
make decisions beyond and above these binding laws. The
material body of man is bounded by these physical laws.
But mind and spirit of man are free. Freedom is the
essence of personality. When Christians claim God to be
a Person we mean just that - God is not under law as the
Hindu and other Eastern religions assume them to be. (In
Hinduism gods can be forced into compliance by proper
yantra, tantra and mantra). Man is a multidimensional
being. Even though his material and mental spheres are
constrained within the laws of those dimensions, the
spirit is free. If a person do not have freedom of will
then, he is no more a person but a robot. A
preprogrammed biorobot is still a robot and not a
person. If our understanding is right what differentiate
human from the animal kingdom is this freedom that God
has given directly to our kind. If this is taken away
man becomes an animal. The question of Calvinism Vs
Arminism is simply whether human beings are persons or
not. In fact Calvinism even freezes God to be a machine.
God looses his personality and becomes a static
PowerPoint where everything simply is and not evolving.
"God is the same yesterday, today and fore ever" simply
came to mean that God is static. God is incapable of
making new decisions and changes in his plans.
Arministic point is that even though God had planned
ahead, considering the freedom that God has granted to
humans by his own original plan God enters into history
and changes his plan of action so as to bring about his
redemption. Humans are actively involved in the making
of history as God is because of the freedom given unto
man. Sure enough it was not necessary for God to give
man freedom. But who are we to question the sovereignty
of God? It was God’s sovereign will to create man with
freedom of will and he has not reduced man an animal at
the first violation of his authority. While Calvinism
looks upon the relation between man and God as a
government. (Calvin’s basic stand is on moral
government) Arminism looks upon it as Father –Son
relationship. When children are born we do not want them
to be robots. We do not want to replace our children
with robots ever. Then we realize that disobedience and
disruptions are to be expected. We are ready as parents
to pay for it and to redeem them. It is this type of God
that Jesus presented to us. The whole concept of
authority and power presented by Jesus was not based on
dictatorship or law, but on love and servanthood. The
greatest of them all in the Kingdom of God is the
servant of all. God is the greatest servant, who stoops
down and cleans up the mess that his children make. Not
because he is not all-powerful and not incapable, but
because that is his nature. In a world of selfishness,
it is difficult to understand such an upside down world.
But that is what Christianity is – God is – if Jesus was
the ultimate revelation of God. We may have to wait for
generations to see such a theology to come into
systematic form. |
  
|