HOME WRITE TO ME... REFERENCES

Neil's Website | Ajit's Website

ATTRIBUTES OF GOD
AND
THEIR SIGNIFICANCE


You may find some excellent Calvinistic arguments in the following sites: Zanchius' Articles and at Christo's site. Matthew J. Slick in his Calvinist Corner gives these arguments in its summarized form. These are summarization of the exhaustive desertions of various giants of history. Internet is filled with these Reformation Theology. Essential Calvinistic arguments are as follows:

The 3 Attributes of God are:

  • Omnipotence - He has the power to do anything He desires (Job 42:2; Luke 1:37).

Job 42: 2 "I know that you can do all things; no plan of yours can be thwarted.


Luk 1: 37 (Mary says) For nothing is impossible with God.

  • Omnipresence - He is in all places, all the time (1 Kings 8

  1. "But will God really dwell on earth? The heavens, even the highest heaven, cannot contain you. How much less this temple I have built!

Psalm 90:2 Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God.

  • Omniscience - He knows all things (1 John 3:20 whenever our hearts condemn us. For God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything.).


  • Out of these attributes flow His works:

  • Election - choosing who is saved (John 1:12-13; 6:37-40; Eph. 1:4;11; Rom.. 8:29-30; Acts 13:48; Phil. 1:29).

  • Creation - bringing the universe into existence (Isaiah 44:24; Col. 1:16-18).

  • Providence - guiding and providing for His creation (Psalm 135:7; Ecc. 3:13; Acts 14:17).

  1. There are natural conclusions to be drawn from God's attributes.

    1. If He is omnipotent, then He has the power to accomplish anything He desires. He can create, alter, or uncreate a universe and all that is in it.


       

    2. *** Therefore He is able to Create whatever He desires.

    3. If He is omnipresent, then nothing is hidden from Him - this means every dimension; all time whether past, present, or future; and every form of existence either thought, action, or substance.


       

    4. *** Therefore He encompasses all He creates.

    5. If He is Omniscient, then He eternally comprehends all things actual as well as potential.

      1. All things actual means all things that do exist.

      2. This includes all combinations of all objects and events that exist.


        This includes every dimension; all time whether past, present, or future; and every form of existence either thought, action, or substance.

      3. All things potential means all things that could exist.

      4. This includes all combinations of all events that might exist but do not.

      5. This includes all that exists only in the mind of God but was not chosen by Him (through His creative action) to exist outside of His mind.

*** Therefore, He knows everything about everything He has created.

Conclusion: With all knowledge, God has absolute control over all He encompasses.

  1. In creation God brought into being a finite set of actualities derived from an infinite set of potentialities. (By actuality I mean all that does exists. By potentiality I mean all that could exist.)

    1. The combinations of the actualities are not infinite,

      1. because the actualities are finite to begin with and are, therefore, incapable of infinite combination.

      2. because having been created and set in motion by God the actual number of combinations has been decided upon by Him.

    2. None of the actualities are accidental, nor can they be accidental,

      1. since accident would suggest something beyond God's omnipotence, omnipresence, and omniscience.

      2. since accident would imply another creator outside the knowledge, presence, and control of God.

    3. None of these actualities can function in a manner that is outside the knowledge, presence, or control of God

      1. because they have been brought into being by Him.

      2. because God cannot make something greater than He.

*** Therefore all that exists is under His knowledge and control.

All that exists, exists not because of accident, but because God has chosen it to exist.

      1. including any result of any combination of events.

        1. since that result would have been fore known and, therefore, brought about by God as He selected the causes that brought that result.

      2. Therefore, all results are fore known; that is, they are known because they are brought about by God, and, by logic, must be what God has caused to occur.

        1. therefore it is fore known to occur

      3. This includes those events which are the results of creatures with wills because,

        1. no will could exist apart from the knowledge or control of God because

        2. God created all wills and/or the condition that provides for the existence of the will.

      4. It follows then that evil is something permitted by God and under His absolute control.

    1. Evil is the permitted rebellion against God, yet it is not greater than He, nor is it out of the reach of His control, nor beyond His knowledge.

    2. God encompasses all that is, including evil. That is, evil is like a circle within a circle

    3. Evil, apart and separate from God, operates within His controlled realm.

    4. Since nothing could exist outside God's control.

    5. Evil, then, operating within the realm of God, can be used by God for His good (Gen. 50:20; Acts 2:23).

      1. Additionally, it also follows, then, that everyone is either elected or not elected into salvation.

        1. This is because in God's infinite control of all things in all time, nothing can exist that He has not brought directly or indirectly into existence, through direct creation or the consequence of His creation.

            1. This includes the person with the will to choose or reject God.

            2. Each person is created by God with tendencies, preferences, and abilities.

              1. This includes the "tendency" to believe or not as some maintain.

            3. Each person is put, by God, in an environment that is helpful or not helpful to receiving the gospel.

            4. God is aware of all these variables, knows the outcome, and places the person there.

        *** Therefore, salvation is dependent solely upon God.


        . . . . .because God is in control of all variables of all situations including the wills
        of His creation.

        It could be no other way.

 

Apparently it is a strong argument for total predetermination. Before discussing it any further let me point out the basic fallacy of the statement. It is precisely this argument of total sovereignty in terms of Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Omniscient God that lead to the proof for the nonexistence of God. Let me state the proof here:

A. All Personal beings have free will. 
     Either God has free will or he is predestined. 
     If God is predestined, God is not a free agent and is not a sovereign. 
     He is not God.

B.  God has free will. 

C.  In order to have free will, you must have more than one option, each of which is avoidable.  This means that before you make a choice, there must be a state of uncertainty during a period of potential. 

D.  God is Omnipotent and should have potency for multiple options. 
       If so God cannot know the future. 

E.  Even if you think God can predict His own decision, if you claim God to have free will, you must admit the potential (if not the desire)  to change His own mind before the decision is finalized. 

E.  A being who knows everything (Omniscient) can have no "state of uncertainty." 
It knows its choices in advance. 
This means that it has no potential to avoid its choices, and therefore lacks Omnipotence and also free will. 
Since a being that lacks free will is not a personal being, a personal being who knows everything cannot exist. 
Therefore, God  who is an Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent person does not exist.

The argument is logical and completely destroys the premises for a monistic sovereign God. There has to be a zero point vibration within Godhead to create a minimum amount of uncertainty for a real God. (This is explained in Hindu philosophy as Nirguna Brahman and Saguna Brahman) This uncertainty pertains to the future and in choices.  God has all the the choices all the time - Omnipotence in a totally free Person. The concept of triune God is the Christian answer to that. This God shares the sovereignty between three persons. It allows for potency of choices, it allows for planning and purposes within the trinity which are inviolable. But it does not allow for Omniscience to the extent of total Foreknowledge nor Total Predestination.

A Mechanistic Model of God and Universe

Essentially the idea of a sovereign God and a Predestined cosmos is the product of the Newtonian Era - of the mechanical model of the universe.

In this model, God has created everything and built into it all the laws so that it will go according to his predetermined way. Cosmos is like a mechanical clock - a clever contraption of an ingenious God. This concept has been boosted by the theory of relativity which is considered as the end point of Classical Physics. In relativity we get the four dimensional space-time continuum. This is the result of the finiteness of the velocity of light.  Here all events are points in a four dimensional world.  It lies on a four dimensional graph paper. So to an Omnipotent God all future events lie as though it is done and over. But there were scientific glitches. A being which can travel on the beam of light will remain unchanged because there is no variation in time. But everything he observes also remain unchanged. If one can travel with a speed greater than light one can go back in time. But no material body can travel with speed greater than light. Even at the speed of light the mass becomes infinite and volume zero.  So we have reached a singularity point.   But a non material body – a spirit – may be able to do that. Thus going back into past will be in a different branch of the cosmos.  Hence it is impossible to change the past events.  This is essential if the principle of causality is to remain.  If this causality principle is violated, the very foundation of science and religion falls out.   So the past is ever present – if we know how to read it.  But there is no condition under which even a spirit or non material body can travel to future.   This is simply because future do not exist.

If God is defined in the way Calvinist define including that there is nothing impossible for God,   all the things mentioned in the beginning are certainly true, - provided the same logic is inapplicable to God - because then they are predetermined precisely. For anyone in the four dimensional world constrained within the constancy of light signal, there is no way of knowing the future. The supposition made here is that God being omnipotent can do so.

Even though there had been science fiction on time travel to future, the theory of relativity would not permit it. It might be possible if the dimensions are increased. The essential concept behind this thought is that the events have already been taken place at least in the mind of God. This will essentially leave the argument closed. Though future is present as in a seedling - a potential fact, future does not exist. There can be possible foreknowledge of the future based on the present. Foreknowledge is based on past and assuming direct cause effect relationship. Under exactly similar conditions exactly same things will occur. But giver variations in situations we should expect variations in the result. Thus foreknowledge really cannot be a fact since the variation in time itself may be become a factor. This is how foreknowledge and forecast works at least in the human plane. One example for the application is meteorology where this principle works well to a great extent.

The fallacy of the argument for predestination is simply that it assumes time and space as absolutes. This was the Newtonian approach. Neither time nor space has any real existence. They are only qualitative aspects of matter in motion. We conceive an abstraction called space from the extension of matter.  We construct an entity called time from the movement and changes of matter. They are interrelated in terms of the changes in properties of matter.  Even though for mathematical purposes we may assume time and space as realities, the results obtained may not correspond to the real world. Every mathematics student knows that not all solutions to a constructed equation are valid. They are subject to boundary conditions. Just as good and evil are only moral realities and not physical realities, time and space are mental constructs and are not physical realities. They are simply concepts derived from matter and its motion. As far as we know from our viewpoint, the past no longer exists, but it is "real" because it has existed.  But  the future is not real, simply because it does not yet exist. We cannot affect the past, but we can affect the future; the past is a closed book, while the future is still contingent upon the present. The past exists only in memory, and the future exists only in possibility. The only reality therefore is now. This has interesting implications for  what God knows. Why do we need to affirm that God knows that which does not yet exist?  God knows the possibilities of the future, but we create the future. That is part of human freedom that God has granted to us.
 
 The Omni Attributes

The attributes of God as enunciated above are answers to metaphysical questions about ultimate reality. And those questions were rooted in the Platonic and Neoplatonic philosophies that saw God  in  idealistic terms. God was defined by asking logical questions. It is based on man's idea of what God should be. Though it is interesting and the results may not be totally invalid, a reality check needs to be made.


The Omni statements as one can easily notice is an attempt to make God as a big man. Omni means all – so we define God as All Powerful (Omni Potent), All Present (Omnipresent) and All Knowing (Omniscient). These are derived directly from the human attributes of power, presence and knowledge. Make them big, We have God.

Rom 1: 21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.

22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man….
True they are making him to be a big man.

However big we may make these, these definitions are not adequate enough to define God so that any meaningful deduction can be made from them. It does not necessarily tell us anything about God. We are making an idol of words. It is a better idol than a brass idol - so that others won't call us idolaters.

What Bible tells us is that God is beyond our definitions. The "Omni" descriptions  consider God in relation to Space-time and Matter energy. God is all-powerful - that takes care of the energy of cosmos.  God is Omnipresent - that takes care of his spatial description, and God is Omniscient - and that takes care of time, past, present and future.  These are nonsensical definitions of God and are the properties of an anthropomorphic God.  But is he?  Is that what the bible tell us?  God is immanent in his creation not as we are. He transcends it.   This is conveyed through the term "holy" which is totally other and inexplicable in human terms. Take any of the attribute supporting verse, you will see that they are simply an acknowledgment of the limitations of human understanding of God's nature.

In mathematics we have such situations which are known as singularities. Singularities are points or regions where we have no knowledge of values. These cannot be extrapolated. Any attempt to do that will end up in false results. Usually, when encountered in theoretical mathematical considerations, singularities are troublemakers, which physically do not make any sense to us. In Quantum Field Theory the problem is solved by means of a tedious but consistent technique called renormalization. In General Theory of Relativity singularities are regarded as real physical entities – Black Holes – the Bottomless Pit. These black holes cannot be seen because informations can go only into it and not out of it. But we can know it by the behaviour of particles near the event horizon. cannot be seen because informations can go only into it and not out of it. But we can know it by the behaviour of particles near the event horizon. We do not know what lies beyond the event horizon.  Actually, every black hole contains a singularity. Universe according to modern cosmology started as a singularity. Though we do not know what lies beyond the event horizon of black hole, It is possibly a totally new universe. We can only see the black hole because of  uncertainty of the point itself.  This is simply a feeble radiation, which can be detected by any simple instrument.  God is a singularity and we can never know His nature.  The only fact we can know is the feeble emanation that we can feel.

The fact that God is totally the other does not mean God cannot be known here and now. Only that God cannot be known fully because God is immanent in this dimension, as he is transcendent. While it is perfectly legitimate to know the immanent nature of God, it will be foolish to assume to understand the transcendent God.  Just as a two dimensional object can be traced into one dimension by projection, we can indeed perceive God's projection into our existence. This I believe was indeed what God told Moses, when he asked God "What is your name?"

"I am that I am". The Hebrew understanding of that was simply, "You will know me through my actions in history." That is all what we can understand of God. It is through the revelation of God in history and in the ultimate revelation through Jesus that we understand God. Not by meditation or logic as the Hindu Sages did. By this logic we simply arrive at the indefinable nature of God and the need of revelation. The ultimate revelation of Jesus in history left the disciples confused.

John 16: 12 "I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear.

To Nicodemus Jesus said:

John 3: 12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?

Job 42:1 Then Job replied to the LORD:

2 "I know that you can do all things; no plan of yours can be thwarted.

  • You asked, 'Who is this that obscures my counsel without knowledge?' Surely I spoke of things I did not understand, things too wonderful for me to know.

    This verse if quoted partially by many Calvinists to show Omnipotence of God. But in its context it is an admission of ignorance of God's power and attributes.
     

    The Omni definition tries to define a monistic Sovereign God – a concept that Christians do not accept as ipso facto. For any real living reality a multiple person in Godhead is a necessity. Even the Hindu Sages realized that and evolved a Saguna Brahman with a trinity - one in essence with each other. It is the interplay of these sovereign persons that allow for the dualities and changes. The indeterminacy of the universe lies in the sovereign nature of not one person but of the Trinity as a whole. In creating creatures in God's own image, God did empty his sovereignty and delegated it to his children at least in some areas. But this freedom that God gave to his creation is the affirmation of the sovereignty of God and not its denial.

    A good example would be to consider a monarch who is sovereign in his state. If this monarch has a son – a royal prince, by virtue of his person, a certain amount of uncertainty is produced. If the monarch judges some one as guilty and condemned him to death and if the son makes him free, he shall be free indeed. It is not a violation of the sovereignty of the monarch, but just the opposite of it.

    A God who does not have the freedom to change his decisions depending on the situation is no more a free agent. We see a picture of this in Darius the King of the Medes and Persia.

    Dan 6: 8 Now, O king, issue the decree and put it in writing so that it cannot be altered-- in accordance with the laws of the Medes and Persians, which cannot be repealed."

    Darius though in principle was the sovereign, he was indeed not - because, the law of the Medes and Persia was.

    A predestinating God ceases to be a Sovereign God because he has already ordained it and is caught up in his own net. (We shall see from history that the Bible does not present such a prisoner God.) This is actually the God of Calvinism.

    Is this sovereignty infringed if the Son sets anyone free outside of the law? Certainly not. The very purpose of the incarnation was to safeguard not only the sovereignty and holiness of God, but also to safeguard the freedom of will of man. Sovereignty of Calvinism makes a mockery of the incarnation. What was the big deal of the cross in the sovereign context? If the election was unconditional and was God's sovereign decree, what purpose did the atonement do?  The sovereign God could have simply pardoned  the sinners without the cross. Calvinism has made the cross of no value.

    A New Approach

    If the Omni statements lead us to contradictions,  the  new paradigms are in existential and process philosophy. Newtonian mechanical model of the universe is replaced with quantum mechanics, genetic indeterminism, and the idea of random event. These approaches were derived because of the awareness of dualism between the absolute pre-determinism and actual indeterminacy. It  again started with the property of light. The once rejected particle theory of light in preference to wave theory of light was to be re written because of the Photoelectric effect. Light some times acts as a particle and sometimes as a wave. Even our eye was created with cones and rods to detect both these properties. Therefore it was necessary to accept the reality that our models are inadequate and needs to be modified. Indeterminacy is therefore built into the universe with the quantum mechanical model.

    Yet in the macro-level foreknowledge is possible. If all the variables are known, it is possible to predict the path of a rocket. But it is impossible to predict the neither position nor path of elementary particles that constitute the rocket.  We do not bother about the particles; we plan for the system and give them the force and the guidance on an on going control process that it can strike the target without fail. If we want to understand the motion of water through a pipeline we may analyze it in terms of the motion of each molecule. But this will be impractical. Instead, we can analyze it in term of pressure head, velocity, and turbulence and eddies. These are collective properties of the fluid. They will then yield coherent and measurable results. The motion of individual molecules may be random within the kinetic theory in any system, yet we can still control it.

    This model is complicated by the introduction of persons. Persons are defined only in terms of free will and not otherwise. Free will implies choice. Thus there is a conflict in terminology when we speak of predestination of individuals. As some honest Calvinist will admit, man has no freewill. He is controlled by his nature, which in the fallen nature is to do only sin. Even when saved man is no more free. He can only do good. This is nothing more than the application of Dialectical materialism, which according to Karl Marx leads to Historical Materialism. Individuals are created by the society in which he lives. Historical Materialism however is dialectical in nature allowing for deviations within the society allowing for cooperating with the direction of movement of history or opposing it with all sorts of subtle shades and variations. Even a bourgoise like Engels could be a leader for Proletariat because of that. A rigid Mecahnistic Materialism would not allow for it.

    Thus history should be interpreted actually in terms of the interaction between free agents - Persons which all coexist with the intent and permission of God. God created man in his own image. Men are all children of God as we are reminded Luke's genealogy of Jesus. God created man as persons with free will, they remained people in spite of the fall. It is this interaction between man and man along with man and God that forms the history. Though good and evil are defined absolutely in terms of God's character in relations to the trinity (within themselves) the existence of good and evil in creation is the result of the interaction of man and creation. That is exactly why history is unpredictable. The direction of movement of history is determined by the forces within - including personalities and powers. God do not predestine it, but directs it. This is where the part of Christians comes in. That is what the sermon on the mount is all about.

    Application of this into the historical process gives some insight. Though there is absolute freedom of will in the context of the situation for every person with infinite variations of choice, history can be directed by God to achieve his desired end without infringement of this freedom. God may introduce elements into history to change the course when necessary. This is achieved by the signs and wonders he performed in the sight of people, the giving of the law, the prophets and finally the sending of his own son. In this age God does this through the Church. That is the purpose of the Church.
     
     

    God did bring in Cosmic and terrestrial events to happen - like the cosmic upheavals after the fall, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorra, the signs and wonders and miracles performed by Moses and Jesus. Even the punishments are considered by New Testament authors as a directive.

    In none of the above arguments we have assumed the existence of free persons out side of God. I am referring to Man who was created in the image of God. Since God is not material this image should refer to his nature. Ironically some Calvinists would have us believe that Adam had freedom of will.  Won't that violate the whole logical argument of predestination?  If Adam's free will do not violate God's sovereignty why should the free will of man today violate God's sovereignty? Adam was God's son. So he was a free man and he took his choice.  So are we all - fallen or unfallen; prodigal or staying in; sinner or saint. Adam never ceased to be the Son of God even after the fall as Luke 3:38 proclaimed. Like the prodigal we wallow in sin because we do not want to return. Maya and samsara has taken our time and thoughts that we forget to look back and see the Father awaiting in anxiety.

    If these do not point us to the attributes of God, what are they?  How are we to find the attributes of God?  The answer simply is to look back into the Bible.  Bible is a revelation of God in action within history.  We cannot know God by meditations and logic.
    Heb 1:1  In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2  but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son.
     

  •