|
ATTRIBUTES OF GOD
AND
THEIR SIGNIFICANCE
You may find some excellent Calvinistic arguments in the
following sites:
Zanchius' Articles
and at
Christo's site.
Matthew J. Slick in his
Calvinist Corner
gives these arguments in its summarized form. These are
summarization of the exhaustive desertions of various
giants of history. Internet is filled with these
Reformation Theology. Essential Calvinistic arguments
are as follows:
|
The 3 Attributes
of God are:
-
Omnipotence
- He has the power to do anything He desires
(Job 42:2; Luke 1:37).
Job 42: 2 "I know
that you can do all things; no plan of
yours can be thwarted.
Luk 1: 37 (Mary says) For nothing is
impossible with God.
-
Omnipresence
- He is in all places, all the time (1 Kings
8
-
"But will God
really dwell on earth? The heavens, even the
highest heaven, cannot contain you. How much
less this temple I have built!
Psalm 90:2 Before the mountains were
born or you brought forth the earth and
the world, from everlasting to
everlasting you are God.
-
Omniscience
- He knows all things (1 John 3:20 whenever
our hearts condemn us. For God is greater
than our hearts, and he knows everything.).
Out of these attributes flow His works:
Election
- choosing who is saved (John 1:12-13;
6:37-40; Eph. 1:4;11; Rom.. 8:29-30; Acts
13:48; Phil. 1:29).
Creation
- bringing the universe into existence
(Isaiah 44:24; Col. 1:16-18).
Providence
- guiding and providing for His creation
(Psalm 135:7; Ecc. 3:13; Acts 14:17).
-
There are
natural conclusions to be drawn from God's
attributes.
-
If He is
omnipotent, then He has the power to
accomplish anything He desires. He can
create, alter, or uncreate a universe
and all that is in it.
-
*** Therefore He is able to Create
whatever He desires.
-
If He is omnipresent, then nothing is
hidden from Him - this means every
dimension; all time whether past,
present, or future; and every form of
existence either thought, action, or
substance.
-
*** Therefore He encompasses all He
creates.
-
If He is Omniscient, then He eternally
comprehends all things actual as well as
potential.
-
All things
actual means all things that do
exist.
-
This includes
all combinations of all objects and
events that exist.
This includes every dimension; all
time whether past, present, or
future; and every form of existence
either thought, action, or
substance.
-
All things
potential means all things that
could exist.
-
This includes
all combinations of all events that
might exist but do not.
-
This includes
all that exists only in the mind of
God but was not chosen by Him
(through His creative action) to
exist outside of His mind.
***
Therefore, He knows everything about
everything He has created.
Conclusion: With
all knowledge, God has absolute control over all
He encompasses.
-
In
creation God brought into being a finite set
of actualities derived from an infinite set
of potentialities.
(By actuality I mean all that does exists.
By potentiality I mean all that could
exist.)
-
The combinations of the actualities are
not infinite,
-
because the
actualities are finite to begin with
and are, therefore, incapable of
infinite combination.
-
because having
been created and set in motion by
God the actual number of
combinations has been decided upon
by Him.
-
None of the actualities are accidental,
nor can they be accidental,
-
since accident
would suggest something beyond God's
omnipotence, omnipresence, and
omniscience.
-
since accident
would imply another creator outside
the knowledge, presence, and control
of God.
-
None of these actualities can function
in a manner that is outside the
knowledge, presence, or control of God
-
because they
have been brought into being by Him.
-
because God
cannot make something greater than
He.
***
Therefore all that
exists is under His knowledge and
control.
All that exists, exists not
because of accident, but because
God has chosen it to exist.
-
including any
result of any combination of events.
-
since that
result would have been fore
known and, therefore, brought
about by God as He selected the
causes that brought that result.
-
Therefore, all
results are fore known; that is,
they are known because they are
brought about by God, and, by logic,
must be what God has caused to
occur.
-
therefore
it is fore known to occur
-
This includes
those events which are the results
of creatures with wills because,
-
no will
could exist apart from the
knowledge or control of God
because
-
God created
all wills and/or the condition
that provides for the existence
of the will.
-
It
follows then that evil is something
permitted by God and under His
absolute control.
-
Evil is the permitted
rebellion against God,
yet it is not greater
than He, nor is it out
of the reach of His
control, nor beyond His
knowledge.
-
God
encompasses all that is,
including evil. That is,
evil is like a circle
within a circle
-
Evil, apart and separate
from God, operates
within His controlled
realm.
-
Since nothing could
exist outside God's
control.
-
Evil, then, operating
within the realm of God,
can be used by God for
His good (Gen. 50:20;
Acts 2:23).
-
Additionally,
it also follows, then, that everyone
is either elected or not elected
into salvation.
-
This is
because in God's infinite
control of all things in all
time, nothing can exist that He
has not brought directly or
indirectly into existence,
through direct creation or the
consequence of His creation.
-
This includes the person
with the will to choose
or reject God.
-
Each person is created
by God with tendencies,
preferences, and
abilities.
-
This includes the
"tendency" to
believe or not as
some maintain.
-
Each person is put, by
God, in an environment
that is helpful or not
helpful to receiving the
gospel.
-
God
is aware of all these
variables, knows the
outcome, and places the
person there.
***
Therefore, salvation is dependent
solely upon God.
. . . . .because God is in control
of all variables of all situations
including the wills
of His creation.
It could be no
other way.
|
Apparently it is a strong argument
for total predetermination. Before discussing it any
further let me point out the basic fallacy of the
statement. It is precisely this argument of total
sovereignty in terms of Omnipotent, Omnipresent,
Omniscient God that lead to the proof for the
nonexistence of God. Let me state the proof here:
|
A. All
Personal beings have free will.
Either God has free will or he is
predestined.
If God is predestined, God is not a
free agent and is not a sovereign.
He is not God.
B. God has free will.
C. In order to have free will, you must
have more than one option, each of which is
avoidable. This means that before you make
a choice, there must be a state of
uncertainty during a period of potential.
D. God is Omnipotent and should have
potency for multiple options.
If so God cannot know the future.
E. Even if you think God can predict His
own decision, if you claim God to have free
will, you must admit the potential (if not
the desire) to change His own mind before
the decision is finalized.
E. A being who knows everything
(Omniscient) can have no "state of
uncertainty."
It knows its choices in advance.
This means that it has no potential to avoid
its choices, and therefore lacks Omnipotence
and also free will.
Since a being that lacks free will is not a
personal being, a personal being who knows
everything cannot exist.
Therefore, God who is an Omniscient,
Omnipresent, Omnipotent person does not
exist. |
The argument is
logical and completely destroys the premises for a
monistic sovereign God. There has to be a zero point
vibration within Godhead to create a minimum amount of
uncertainty for a real God. (This is explained in Hindu
philosophy as Nirguna Brahman and Saguna Brahman) This
uncertainty pertains to the future and in choices. God
has all the the choices all the time - Omnipotence in a
totally free Person. The concept of triune God is the
Christian answer to that. This God shares the
sovereignty between three persons. It allows for potency
of choices, it allows for planning and purposes within
the trinity which are inviolable. But it does not allow
for Omniscience to the extent of total Foreknowledge nor
Total Predestination.
A Mechanistic Model of God and
Universe
Essentially the
idea of a sovereign God and a Predestined cosmos is the
product of the Newtonian Era - of the mechanical model
of the universe.
In this model,
God has created everything and built into it all the
laws so that it will go according to his predetermined
way. Cosmos is like a mechanical clock - a clever
contraption of an ingenious God. This concept has been
boosted by the theory of relativity which is considered
as the end point of Classical Physics. In relativity we
get the four dimensional space-time continuum. This is
the result of the finiteness of the velocity of light.
Here all events are points in a four dimensional world.
It lies on a four dimensional graph paper. So to an
Omnipotent God all future events lie as though it is
done and over. But there were scientific glitches. A
being which can travel on the beam of light will remain
unchanged because there is no variation in time. But
everything he observes also remain unchanged. If one can
travel with a speed greater than light one can go back
in time. But no material body can travel with speed
greater than light. Even at the speed of light the mass
becomes infinite and volume zero. So we have reached a
singularity point. But a non material body a spirit
may be able to do that. Thus going back into past will
be in a different branch of the cosmos. Hence it is
impossible to change the past events. This is essential
if the principle of causality is to remain. If this
causality principle is violated, the very foundation of
science and religion falls out. So the past is ever
present if we know how to read it. But there is no
condition under which even a spirit or non material body
can travel to future. This is simply because future do
not exist.
If God is
defined in the way Calvinist define including that there
is nothing impossible for God, all the things
mentioned in the beginning are certainly true, -
provided the same logic is inapplicable to God - because
then they are predetermined precisely. For anyone in the
four dimensional world constrained within the constancy
of light signal, there is no way of knowing the future.
The supposition made here is that God being omnipotent
can do so.
Even though
there had been science fiction on time travel to future,
the theory of relativity would not permit it. It might
be possible if the dimensions are increased. The
essential concept behind this thought is that the events
have already been taken place at least in the mind of
God. This will essentially leave the argument closed.
Though future is present as in a seedling - a potential
fact, future does not exist. There can be possible
foreknowledge of the future based on the present.
Foreknowledge is based on past and assuming direct cause
effect relationship. Under exactly similar conditions
exactly same things will occur. But giver variations in
situations we should expect variations in the result.
Thus foreknowledge really cannot be a fact since the
variation in time itself may be become a factor. This is
how foreknowledge and forecast works at least in the
human plane. One example for the application is
meteorology where this principle works well to a great
extent.
The fallacy of
the argument for predestination is simply that it
assumes time and space as absolutes. This was the
Newtonian approach. Neither time nor space has any real
existence. They are only qualitative aspects of matter
in motion. We conceive an abstraction called space from
the extension of matter. We construct an entity called
time from the movement and changes of matter. They are
interrelated in terms of the changes in properties of
matter. Even though for mathematical purposes we may
assume time and space as realities, the results obtained
may not correspond to the real world. Every mathematics
student knows that not all solutions to a constructed
equation are valid. They are subject to boundary
conditions. Just as good and evil are only moral
realities and not physical realities, time and space are
mental constructs and are not physical realities. They
are simply concepts derived from matter and its motion.
As far as we know from our viewpoint, the past no longer
exists, but it is "real" because it has existed. But
the future is not real, simply because it does not yet
exist. We cannot affect the past, but we can affect the
future; the past is a closed book, while the future is
still contingent upon the present. The past exists only
in memory, and the future exists only in possibility.
The only reality therefore is now. This has interesting
implications for what God knows. Why do we need to
affirm that God knows that which does not yet exist?
God knows the possibilities of the future, but we create
the future. That is part of human freedom that God has
granted to us.
The
Omni Attributes
The attributes
of God as enunciated above are answers to metaphysical
questions about ultimate reality. And those questions
were rooted in the Platonic and Neoplatonic philosophies
that saw God in idealistic terms. God was defined by
asking logical questions. It is based on man's idea of
what God should be. Though it is interesting and the
results may not be totally invalid, a reality check
needs to be made.
The Omni statements as one can easily notice is an
attempt to make God as a big man. Omni means all so we
define God as All Powerful (Omni Potent), All Present
(Omnipresent) and All Knowing (Omniscient). These are
derived directly from the human attributes of power,
presence and knowledge. Make them big, We have God.
Rom 1: 21 For
although they knew God, they neither glorified him as
God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became
futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.
22 Although they
claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the
glory of the immortal God for images made to look like
mortal man
.
True they are making him to be a big man.
However big we
may make these, these definitions are not adequate
enough to define God so that any meaningful deduction
can be made from them. It does not necessarily tell us
anything about God. We are making an idol of words. It
is a better idol than a brass idol - so that others
won't call us idolaters.
What Bible tells
us is that God is beyond our definitions. The "Omni"
descriptions consider God in relation to Space-time and
Matter energy. God is all-powerful - that takes care of
the energy of cosmos. God is Omnipresent - that takes
care of his spatial description, and God is Omniscient -
and that takes care of time, past, present and future.
These are nonsensical definitions of God and are the
properties of an anthropomorphic God. But is he? Is
that what the bible tell us? God is immanent in his
creation not as we are. He transcends it. This is
conveyed through the term "holy" which is totally other
and inexplicable in human terms. Take any of the
attribute supporting verse, you will see that they are
simply an acknowledgment of the limitations of human
understanding of God's nature.
In mathematics
we have such situations which are known as
singularities. Singularities are points or regions where
we have no knowledge of values. These cannot be
extrapolated. Any attempt to do that will end up in
false results. Usually, when encountered in theoretical
mathematical considerations, singularities are
troublemakers, which physically do not make any sense to
us. In Quantum Field Theory the problem is solved by
means of a tedious but consistent technique called
renormalization. In General Theory of Relativity
singularities are regarded as real physical entities
Black Holes the Bottomless Pit. These black holes
cannot be seen because informations can go only into it
and not out of it. But we can know it by the behaviour
of particles near the event horizon. cannot be seen
because informations can go only into it and not out of
it. But we can know it by the behaviour of particles
near the event horizon. We do not know what lies beyond
the event horizon. Actually, every black hole contains
a singularity. Universe according to modern cosmology
started as a singularity. Though we do not know what
lies beyond the event horizon of black hole, It is
possibly a totally new universe. We can only see the
black hole because of uncertainty of the point itself.
This is simply a feeble radiation, which can be detected
by any simple instrument. God is a singularity and we
can never know His nature. The only fact we can know is
the feeble emanation that we can feel.
The fact that
God is totally the other does not mean God cannot be
known here and now. Only that God cannot be known fully
because God is immanent in this dimension, as he is
transcendent. While it is perfectly legitimate to know
the immanent nature of God, it will be foolish to assume
to understand the transcendent God. Just as a two
dimensional object can be traced into one dimension by
projection, we can indeed perceive God's projection into
our existence. This I believe was indeed what God told
Moses, when he asked God "What is your name?"
"I am that I
am". The Hebrew understanding of that was simply, "You
will know me through my actions in history." That is all
what we can understand of God. It is through the
revelation of God in history and in the ultimate
revelation through Jesus that we understand God. Not by
meditation or logic as the Hindu Sages did. By this
logic we simply arrive at the indefinable nature of God
and the need of revelation. The ultimate revelation of
Jesus in history left the disciples confused.
John 16: 12 "I
have much more to say to you, more than you can now
bear.
To Nicodemus
Jesus said:
John 3: 12 I
have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not
believe; how then will you believe if I speak of
heavenly things?
Job 42:1 Then
Job replied to the LORD:
2 "I know that
you can do all things; no plan of yours can be thwarted.
You asked, 'Who
is this that obscures my counsel without knowledge?'
Surely I spoke of things I did not understand, things
too wonderful for me to know.
This verse if
quoted partially by many Calvinists to show Omnipotence
of God. But in its context it is an admission of
ignorance of God's power and attributes.
The Omni
definition tries to define a monistic Sovereign God a
concept that Christians do not accept as ipso facto. For
any real living reality a multiple person in Godhead is
a necessity. Even the Hindu Sages realized that and
evolved a Saguna Brahman with a trinity - one in essence
with each other. It is the interplay of these sovereign
persons that allow for the dualities and changes. The
indeterminacy of the universe lies in the sovereign
nature of not one person but of the Trinity as a whole.
In creating creatures in God's own image, God did empty
his sovereignty and delegated it to his children at
least in some areas. But this freedom that God gave to
his creation is the affirmation of the sovereignty of
God and not its denial.
A good example
would be to consider a monarch who is sovereign in his
state. If this monarch has a son a royal prince, by
virtue of his person, a certain amount of uncertainty is
produced. If the monarch judges some one as guilty and
condemned him to death and if the son makes him free, he
shall be free indeed. It is not a violation of the
sovereignty of the monarch, but just the opposite of it.
A God who does
not have the freedom to change his decisions depending
on the situation is no more a free agent. We see a
picture of this in Darius the King of the Medes and
Persia.
Dan 6: 8 Now, O
king, issue the decree and put it in writing so that it
cannot be altered-- in accordance with the laws of the
Medes and Persians, which cannot be repealed."
Darius though in
principle was the sovereign, he was indeed not -
because, the law of the Medes and Persia was.
A predestinating
God ceases to be a Sovereign God because he has already
ordained it and is caught up in his own net. (We shall
see from history that the Bible does not present such a
prisoner God.) This is actually the God of Calvinism.
Is this
sovereignty infringed if the Son sets anyone free
outside of the law? Certainly not. The very purpose of
the incarnation was to safeguard not only the
sovereignty and holiness of God, but also to safeguard
the freedom of will of man. Sovereignty of Calvinism
makes a mockery of the incarnation. What was the big
deal of the cross in the sovereign context? If the
election was unconditional and was God's sovereign
decree, what purpose did the atonement do? The
sovereign God could have simply pardoned the sinners
without the cross. Calvinism has made the cross of no
value.
A New Approach
If the Omni
statements lead us to contradictions, the new
paradigms are in existential and process philosophy.
Newtonian mechanical model of the universe is replaced
with quantum mechanics, genetic indeterminism, and the
idea of random event. These approaches were derived
because of the awareness of dualism between the absolute
pre-determinism and actual indeterminacy. It again
started with the property of light. The once rejected
particle theory of light in preference to wave theory of
light was to be re written because of the Photoelectric
effect. Light some times acts as a particle and
sometimes as a wave. Even our eye was created with cones
and rods to detect both these properties. Therefore it
was necessary to accept the reality that our models are
inadequate and needs to be modified. Indeterminacy is
therefore built into the universe with the quantum
mechanical model.
Yet in the
macro-level foreknowledge is possible. If all the
variables are known, it is possible to predict the path
of a rocket. But it is impossible to predict the neither
position nor path of elementary particles that
constitute the rocket. We do not bother about the
particles; we plan for the system and give them the
force and the guidance on an on going control process
that it can strike the target without fail. If we want
to understand the motion of water through a pipeline we
may analyze it in terms of the motion of each molecule.
But this will be impractical. Instead, we can analyze it
in term of pressure head, velocity, and turbulence and
eddies. These are collective properties of the fluid.
They will then yield coherent and measurable results.
The motion of individual molecules may be random within
the kinetic theory in any system, yet we can still
control it.
This model is
complicated by the introduction of persons. Persons are
defined only in terms of free will and not otherwise.
Free will implies choice. Thus there is a conflict in
terminology when we speak of predestination of
individuals. As some honest Calvinist will admit, man
has no freewill. He is controlled by his nature, which
in the fallen nature is to do only sin. Even when saved
man is no more free. He can only do good. This is
nothing more than the application of Dialectical
materialism, which according to Karl Marx leads to
Historical Materialism. Individuals are created by the
society in which he lives. Historical Materialism
however is dialectical in nature allowing for deviations
within the society allowing for cooperating with the
direction of movement of history or opposing it with all
sorts of subtle shades and variations. Even a bourgoise
like Engels could be a leader for Proletariat because of
that. A rigid Mecahnistic Materialism would not allow
for it.
Thus history
should be interpreted actually in terms of the
interaction between free agents - Persons which all
coexist with the intent and permission of God. God
created man in his own image. Men are all children of
God as we are reminded Luke's genealogy of Jesus. God
created man as persons with free will, they remained
people in spite of the fall. It is this interaction
between man and man along with man and God that forms
the history. Though good and evil are defined absolutely
in terms of God's character in relations to the trinity
(within themselves) the existence of good and evil in
creation is the result of the interaction of man and
creation. That is exactly why history is unpredictable.
The direction of movement of history is determined by
the forces within - including personalities and powers.
God do not predestine it, but directs it. This is where
the part of Christians comes in. That is what the sermon
on the mount is all about.
Application of
this into the historical process gives some insight.
Though there is absolute freedom of will in the context
of the situation for every person with infinite
variations of choice, history can be directed by God to
achieve his desired end without infringement of this
freedom. God may introduce elements into history to
change the course when necessary. This is achieved by
the signs and wonders he performed in the sight of
people, the giving of the law, the prophets and finally
the sending of his own son. In this age God does this
through the Church. That is the purpose of the Church.
God did bring in
Cosmic and terrestrial events to happen - like the
cosmic upheavals after the fall, the destruction of
Sodom and Gomorra, the signs and wonders and miracles
performed by Moses and Jesus. Even the punishments are
considered by New Testament authors as a directive.
In none of the
above arguments we have assumed the existence of free
persons out side of God. I am referring to Man who was
created in the image of God. Since God is not material
this image should refer to his nature. Ironically some
Calvinists would have us believe that Adam had freedom
of will. Won't that violate the whole logical argument
of predestination? If Adam's free will do not violate
God's sovereignty why should the free will of man today
violate God's sovereignty? Adam was God's son. So he was
a free man and he took his choice. So are we all -
fallen or unfallen; prodigal or staying in; sinner or
saint. Adam never ceased to be the Son of God even after
the fall as Luke 3:38 proclaimed. Like the prodigal we
wallow in sin because we do not want to return. Maya and
samsara has taken our time and thoughts that we forget
to look back and see the Father awaiting in anxiety.
If these do not
point us to the attributes of God, what are they? How
are we to find the attributes of God? The answer simply
is to look back into the Bible. Bible is a revelation
of God in action within history. We cannot know God by
meditations and logic.
Heb 1:1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers
through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his
Son.
|