From
the lofty ideals of
the Word, how did
India became
idolatrous?
Early Vedic
teachings do not
envisage idol
worship or worship
of lower gods.
In the beginning God
was there and he was
a spirit. (Iathereya
Upanishad:1/1/1)
The one that does
not obey to words,
and the one that
makes the words to
work and that is
Brahma. Anything
other than this is
not Brahma. (Kena
Upanishad:1/5)
He that cannot be
seen and he that is
glorious and great,
he that is not known
by anybody ever, is
that God, for whom
you must not make
any idols. He is
Hiranyagarban, and
he is glory. He that
is without beginning
and end let him save
and protect us. We
must worship him
only. (Yajur
Veda:32/3)
When those who offer
sacrifices sees him
in the fire, and
when the sages see
him in their hearts,
and when others see
him everywhere,
those who are
ignorant and low in
knowledge see him in
idols and search god
in idols and worship
the idols. (Uthara
geetha and Agni
purana)
"Na pratheeke nahisa"
There is no spirit
in the idols.
(Brahma
suthram:4/1:4)
You should worship
the god that is
spirit only thru
your minds. Those
who worship him
through idols and
other means will
eventually get to
death. (Brah:
Upanishishad:
4/4/19)
"Those who do only
deeds and wait for
their moksha are
living in utter
darkness. Even after
abandoning their
good deeds, those
who worship
different kind of
goddesses and gods
without worshipping
the God who is only
a spirit will go to
greater damnation
than everybody
else." (Isha
Upanishad:1/9)
The purushan that
you see in your eyes
is that spirit. (Chandakya
Upanishad:8/7/4)
They are going away
without knowing and
understanding the
the God, who is a
spirit. Those who
worship the images
as the spirit or god
blindly will
enventually be
damned, even if they
are men or asuras or
(angels or men),
because they do not
realize the truth.
(Chanda:Upanishad:8/8/4)
Those who worship
many goddesses
without worshipping
the God who is a
Spirit, do not know
the truth. And they
are like animals
among those who know
the truth. (Satpatha
Brahmana)
http://www.geocities.com/ejking2002/
However idol worship
and worship of many
lower gods are a
part of Hinduism
today. This must
have developed out
of the need for
popular modes of
communications. We
all use symbols to
express the
inexpressible
concepts. The
symbols and models
and artistic
presentations
improves impact and
produces long term
memory of what is
taught. Power Point
presentations are
the norm of today.
Icons were produced
for the same
purpose.
Iconography is
defined as (a)
Pictorial
illustration of a
subject. (b) The
collected
representations
illustrating a
subject. (c) A set
of specified or
traditional symbolic
forms associated
with the subject or
theme of a stylized
work of art.


Iconography
Icons are the
traditional art form
of the Early Church.
During the early
years of the
Christian Church, a
new art form was
created to help
reveal this new
faith to the world.
This art's chief
goal was to express
the view of the
world held by the
Church -- God's
interaction with
man, man's calling
to be a new
creation, ...the
breath, and the look
of holiness. An icon
at its very root is
a portrayal of
Christ's image and
imprint on the
world, thus helping
us better understand
who God is and what
He is like. …. .
http://www.trinitystores.com/main.php4?iconography=*
The appearance of
icons is justified
in the essence of
the following
sentence: "In the
Old Testament God
was heard, in the
New Testament he was
seen." In other
words, in the Old
Testament the
pre-image, the
archetype, is given
whereas in the New
Testament it is a
requirement. ….
Supplementing
Dionysius
Aeropagiticus (6th
c.), Theodore of
Studios (9th c.)
wrote: "The shadow
is not the same as
the mass which casts
it;... the icon is a
visualization..."
The icon is a
theological mark and
a mark of theology;
its application is
in its vocabulary.
For the faithful it
is a reverence, an
observance of faith;
for the eye it is a
visualization; for
the reason it is a
distinguishing mark;
for the spiritual
perception it is a
pre-image. The
pre-image is an
archetype, the first
depiction a
prototype, the
visualization is an
icon - this is the
axiom of Orthodoxy,
the Eastern
Christianity….
The
language of signs
was enriched and
made more complex.
Allegories,
metaphors and
personifications
which the Byzantine
rhetoricians and the
liturgists had been
uttering for
centuries were
utilized….
THEOLOGY - ART –
TECHNIQUES
Aneta
Serafimova
http://www.gov.mk/kultura/ologyart.htm
But in most Eastern
Churches it went
much further than
that to idolatory.
Here is how the
Eastern Churches
presents this:
In the fullness of
time, God put on
flesh; He made
himself a man. Now,
not only had we seen
God in the flesh,
but we had seen His
face. Now there was
a certain obligation
to make an icon of
God in the flesh as
a means of education
and veneration.. The
failure to depict
Him in images
suggested that He
had not become man.
One cannot separate
God from Jesus
Christ; it is
impossible to create
an icon of Christ
without, at the same
time, making God
present……It is not
idolatry when
reverencing the
Saint, because the
veneration is not to
the human person,
but to God who
dwells in him, who
sanctifies him. We
venerate and worship
the icon, but
adoration belongs to
God.
The Church has
taught Her people
that, in the icon of
Christ, we also
"see" God the
Father. Christ is
the very Image or
Icon of the Father;
so where One is
present so is the
Other.
The iconographer
possesses an
unbelievable gift
from God. He/She is
able to bring the
Saints, the angels,
the Theotokos, and
even Christ God
Himself to earth.
They are present
with us, in their
icons. They are
there in a very
literal way;
mystically,
spiritually
The
Icon: A
Manifestation of
Theology
http://www.traditionaliconography.com/icon.htm
Does this not sound
more like the
following quote from
the Hinduwebsite?
1.It
is the easiest way
to instill faith and
devotion in man. As
an abstract concept
God may be appealing
to the intellectual
minds, but to the
ordinary individual
who is busy with his
own household
responsibilities and
not well versed in
the scriptural
knowledge,
scholarship or the
path of knowledge
may not be very
appealing. On the
contrary an image
can appeal to him
instantly and draw
him into religious
life. The idol
becomes to him all
that God represents
to others: the all
compassionate giver
of boons and
blessings, who would
pay attention to
their woes and help
them in times of
distress.
2. It
is a way of
acknowledging the
omniscience and
omnipresence of God.
If God is
omnipresent, then
every thing in the
universe, including
the idol one
worships, is filled
with His energy and
presence. Every
thing in the
universe becomes
equally sacred and
worth worshipping.
When we look at the
photograph of a
person, we almost
feel as if we are
looking at the
person though we all
know that it is just
an image. If the
photograph belongs
to a great
personality, some
one like a national
or religious leader,
we treat it with the
great respect as if
we are treating the
real person. It
would hurt our
sentiments greatly
if some one shows
disrespect to it
openly in the public
or in front of us.
In idol worship the
approach of a
devotee is much the
same. He ascribes a
particular form or
image to his
personal God and
gives Him as much
love and respect as
he would give to God
Himself.
3. In
Hinduism there is a
religious sanction
for such a practice
…... Besides idol
worship gives
immense freedom to
an individual to
worship God in his
own way. This is in
line with the true
traditions of
Hinduism which gives
unlimited choice to
its followers to
approach God in
whatever they choose
to worship Him.
4.
The idols help the
devotee to become
deeply religious. A
devout Hindu goes to
a temple and
worships his
favorite deity to
charge himself with
religious currents
and keep himself
going for days
together amidst busy
worldly activity. It
reinforces his faith
in God and his
confidence to face
the difficulties in
life. Once installed
in the house or in a
puja mandir (place
of worship in a
house), the very
house becomes a
place of God's
residence, a very
sacred place, a
temple by itself.
The image that
stands there reminds
the devout members
of the household to
become constantly
aware of the divine
presence amidst them
and of their
religious duties and
responsibilities. It
inspires devout men
to keep their houses
pure and clean and
not to indulge in
sacrilegious acts.
5.
Aid to
concentration: More
than any abstract
concept, an image or
a symbol (yantra) is
the best aid to
concentrate and
control ones mind
and attention. By
keeping the mind
concentrated on a
particular image,
the mind can be
stabilized. Modern
science is slowly
unraveling the
secrets of the mind
and its capacity to
manifest reality. It
is now a widely
accepted fact that
mental images and
forms one entertains
in ones mind greatly
shape ones life and
destiny and that the
mind (especially the
subconscious part of
it) has the capacity
to realize whatever
form or symbol it
concentrates upon.
The ancient Hindus
were aware of the
potentiality of the
mind and therefore
they did not object
to the worship of
idols. They knew
that it is was one
of the best ways to
lead the other wise
fickle human mind
towards God.
6. In
idol worship the
"true" worshipper
becomes God! The
statue stands
symbolically for the
whole process of
creation. According
to Hinduism the
worlds and beings
came into existence
when Purusha (Divine
Will and
consciousness)
entered Prakriti
(Nature, Energy or
Matter). The forms
and ideas already
exist in the
consciousness of
Hiranyagarbha (the
world soul, the
first creative
golden germ) and He
brings them to life
by pouring into them
His essence. The
world (Viraj) was an
idea until the life
breath entered into
it and brought it to
life. The word "jagat"
(the world) means
that which is
bright, awake or
conscious. When an
idol is worshipped
with intense love
and devotion, almost
a similar process
takes place in the
mind of the
worshipper. The
statue is no doubt
inert and inactive
piece of matter at
the physical level,
but in his mind, the
devotee can pour his
devotion and thought
energies into it and
bring it to life and
derive inspiration
and guidance from
it. This is exactly
what happens when
someone worships a
deity deeply and
devotedly. The idol,
which is physically
inert and unmoving,
becomes alive and
active at least in
his thoughts and
dreams. In doing so
the worshipper is
but repeating the
act of creation.
With the help of his
mental energies, he
is trying to bring
to life in his mind
an image that is
outwardly inactive.
Thus, deep in his
inner world, he
becomes a creator,
the very
Hiranyagarbha, God
Himself.
7.
The statue reminds
one of the ephemeral
nature of our
existence ….
8. It
is the best means of
silent
communication.
9. It
is an
acknowledgement of
ones ignorance and
helplessness. God is
far and above,
vastly unknown or
known only through
glimpses and
symbols. The
ordinary individual
who is a slave to
his senses and
desires can never
come face to face
with Him. How can He
be known by him who
is beyond the
senses, the mind,
the words and even
ones own
intelligence (buddhi)?
The ego can never
understand Him. No
amount of logic can
help us to unravel
His secrets. So the
devotee creates an
image of Him in his
mental world and
worships him
expressing his
gratitude and his
deep devotion.
10.
Worship of God is
worship of Self ….
the fact that
worship of deity is
also worship of the
divinity that exists
in oneself.
http://hinduwebsite.com/idols.htm
It is not difficult
to see that the
theology of
iconography and the
theology of idol
worship are very
much identical. If
we see the
development of idol
worship in Indian
Religions the
parallel development
is seen in all
Eastern Churches and
the Roman Churches.
Here is a sound
advise from an
anonymous person on
the internet:
“bit of advice to
Hindus, if you do
not want people to
refer to you as
idolators/idol
worshipers, you
should yourselves
never refer to your
religious images as
"idols" and instead
only use the words
like statue, image,
icon.”
Idolatory is not in
making the idols,
but in confusing the
symbol with the
reality. Since
any symbol can be
confused with the
reality and the
message it is
supposed to convey,
the chance of an
icon becoming an
idol is very great.
We see this not only
in Hinduism, but
also in Christian
Churches in Rome and
the East as we just
read. Only in India
it has become a very
intricate art both
in expression and in
representation and
in due course the
content of the
message was totally
lost.
May
30, 2002
The Seventh
Ecumenical Council:
Icons Vindicated
To
make our confession
short, we keep
unchanged all the
ecclesiastical
traditions handed
down to us, whether
in writing or
verbally, one of
which is the making
of pictorial
representations,
agreeable to the
history of the
preaching of the
Gospel, a tradition
useful in many
respects, but
especially in this,
that so the
incarnation of the
Word of God is shown
forth as real and
not merely
phantastic, for
these have mutual
indications and
without doubt have
also mutual
significations.
We,
therefore, following
the royal pathway
and the divinely
inspired authority
of our Holy Fathers
and the traditions
of the Catholic
Church (for, as we
all know, the Holy
Spirit indwells
her), define with
all certitude and
accuracy that just
as the figure of the
precious and
life-giving Cross,
so also the
venerable and holy
images, as well in
painting and mosaic
as of other fit
materials, should be
set forth in the
holy churches of
God, and on the
sacred vessels and
on the vestments and
on hangings and in
pictures both in
houses and by the
wayside, to wit, the
figure of our Lord
God and Saviour
Jesus Christ, of our
spotless Lady, the
Mother of God, of
the honourable
Angels, of all
Saints and of all
pious people. For by
so much more
frequently as they
are seen in artistic
representation, by
so much more readily
are men lifted up to
the memory of their
prototypes, and to a
longing after them;
and to these should
be given due
salutation and
honourable reverence
(aspasmon kai
timhtikhn proskunh-sin),
not indeed that true
worship of faith (latreian)
which pertains alone
to the divine
nature; but to
these, as to the
figure of the
precious and
life-giving Cross
and to the Book of
the Gospels and to
the other holy
objects, incense and
lights may be
offered according to
ancient pious
custom. For the
honour which is paid
to the image passes
on to that which the
image represents,
and he who reveres
the image reveres in
it the subject
represented. For
thus the teaching of
our holy Fathers,
that is the
tradition of the
Catholic Church,
which from one end
of the earth to the
other hath received
the Gospel, is
strengthened. Thus
we follow Paul, who
spake in Christ, and
the whole divine
Apostolic company
and the holy
Fathers, holding
fast the traditions
which we have
received. So we sing
prophetically the
triumphal hymns of
the Church, "Rejoice
greatly, O daughter
of Sion; Shout, O
daughter of
Jerusalem. Rejoice
and be glad with all
thy heart. The Lord
hath taken away from
thee the oppression
of thy adversaries;
thou art redeemed
from the hand of
thine enemies. The
Lord is a King in
the midst of thee;
thou shalt not see
evil any more, and
peace be unto thee
forever."
Notice the
connection between
Christology and the
use of icons in that
first paragraph
("the incarnation of
the Word of God is
shown forth as real
and not merely
phantastic"). For
the early fathers,
and for all Orthodox
believers to the
present day, if we
are going to take
the Incarnation of
the Lord Christ
seriously then we
had better not deny
the making of such
images. God in His
pure essence is
unseen, and so such
images we do not
make; but in these
last days He has
made Himself known
through the
Incarnation of the
God-Man Jesus
Christ, and so we
may now make images
with a clear
conscience.
Notice also the
council's
declaration that the
honor paid to the
image transfers to
the prototype, i.e.
the one represented
in the image.
Orthodox Christians
do not believe that
anything divine
dwells within
the image, but
showing honor to
those to whom it is
due demands that
honor be paid to
those things by
which they are
represented..
http://www.wayneolson.com/weblog/archives/000426.html
The entry of the
lower gods in the
scene may be another
factor. The ruler
cult started as an
expression of
gratitude to
benefactors and
became an expression
of homage and
loyalty. Its
socio-political
importance was that
it served to testify
to loyalty and to
satisfy the ambition
of leading families.
Nevertheless,
material and
political wellbeing
could arouse genuine
religious emotions.
The subject of the
ruler cult has
special importance
for the study of
early Christianity
because it formed
the focal point of
the early church's
conflict with
paganism in Asia as
well as in India.
Thus every god was
of Royal family.
Intrigues of the
royal family feuds
formed the
background for
mythical stories.
Alexander the Great.
seems to have wished
to be a god in his
lifetime, and the
Hellenistic
monarchies followed
suit. They received
what are called (isotheoi
timai) honors equal
to the gods:
priests, sacrifices,
and worship.
Political tribes
were named after
them, their birthday
and day of ascension
were celebrated like
religious holidays.
The kings assumed
titles associated
with their godlike
actions: ktistes
(founder), euergetes
(benefactor), soter
(savior). As the
Angels and Saints
are venerated, local
heroes came to be
venerated. They
were real
benefactors who
helped in material
realms They came
to be deified and
formed the pantheon
of gods.. Iskander
was the first Aryan
monarch to be
deified.
(Emperor Worship
and Roman Religion
ITTAI GRADEL,
University of Aarhus,
Denmark)
http://www.ualberta.ca/~csmackay/CLASS_378/Emperor.Worship.html
http://www.theologywebsite.com/history/rulercult.shtml
In a research study
Dr.N. Gopala Pillai
he establishes that
Skanda is simply the
deified Alexander
the great and Skanda
Purana is the
mythologised history
of his life and
conquest.
http://murugan.org/research/gopalapillai.htm
- from the
Proceedings of the
All-India Oriental
Conference Vol. IX (Trivandrum:
Government Press,
1937), pp. 955-997
The
same argument will
hold for Rama,
Krishna, Pandavas,
Kauravas.