Anyone who reads
through the
vedas and
vedanta will be
struck by the
utter
discontinuity
between the
two. The very
name vedanta
does not mean
the crux and
essence of veda,
but actually
means end of the
vedas. Vedanta
actually
destroyed all
vedic roots and
came into
existence out of
a new and
fundamentally
different source
of power - none
other than the
Christ as
preached by
Thomas the
Apostle of
India.
Siva is usually
associated with
Rudra of the
Veda. According
to Saiva
Sittanta, Siva
is a Supreme
loving God who
took the form of
a man and
suffered to save
the human
beings. Whereas
in the Vedas,
Rudra is
portrayed as one
of the minor
deities, and he
is the god of
storms. Likewise
Vaishnavite
Vishnu is
nothing to do
with the Vedic
Vishnu. In the
Vedas, Vishnu is
the sun god, a
creature whereas
Vishnu is the
Prime God in
Vaishnavism
“Saivism and
Vaishnavism are
the offshoot of
Early Indian
Christianity.
Early Indian
Christianity
observed the
elements of
Dravidian
worships that
prevailed in the
pre - Christian
era, and
developed as
Saivism and
Vaishnavism.
Saivism and
Vaishnavism
developed as a
Bhakti movement
around 6th, 7th
c. A.D. in South
India and spread
to the North.
Since it is now
totally
camouflaged by
the Brahman
concept under
the name of
Hinduism, it is
generally
thought that the
Vedas are the
basis for the
development of
this Bhakti
Movement.
Generally
Saivite Siva is
identified with
Vedic Rudra and
Vaishnavite
Vishnu is
identified with
Vedic Vishnu. An
in-depth study
of the Vedas
will unveil the
hidden truths.
Saivism and
Vaishnavism have
nothing to do
with the Vedic
Rudra or
Vishnu.”
Thus
Dr. M.
Deivanayagam
and
Dr. D. Devakala
in The Revival
Movement of
Dravidian
Religion
lists the
follwing factors
which emerged
independent of
Vedic influence.
1.
Emergence of the
basic doctrines
of Saivism and
Vaishnavism
depending not on
Aryanism or the
Vedas.
2.
Development of
these doctrines
which are not
seen in the
Vedas
3.
Emergence of new
Agamas, totally
contrary to the
Vedas
4.
Emergence of
temple worship,
contrary to the
Vedas.
5.
Emergence of
Nayanmars and
Alwars who did
not belong to
the Vedic
religion.
6.
The doctrinal
explanation of
Sankara,
Ramanuja and
Mathva which are
contrary to the
Vedas.
7.
Emergence of the
names of Gods
viz. Siva,
Vishnu, Brahma,
Sakthi ....who
are contrary to
the Vedic
deities.
8.
Emergence of the
worship of God
in Triune form
instead of
worshipping the
Vedic deities'.17
They conclude
thus:
When
Christianity
came to India,
the New
testament was
not compiled at
that time.
Naturally this
would lead to
the lack of
historicity. The
need of
presenting
Christianity at
the grass root
level in the
later period led
to the
development of
myths. Since the
doctrine of
trinity,
doctrine of
avatar, and the
doctrine of
fulfillment of
sacrifice have
to be explained
in the mythical
aspect at the
grass root
level, mythical
Christ is seen
in the Indian
religions in
different
languages in
different terms.
Though the terms
are different
and seem to be
different Gods
and Goddesses,
they all refer
to one God. An
unbiased
examination of
myths would
unveil the
hidden Christ.
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/1412/origin.html
Saiva Sidhanta
The basic creed
of the saiva
sidhantha is
given by the
Saiva Sidhantha
Church as
follows:
“A Creed of
Saivite Hindus
1.
We BELIEVE Lord
Siva is God,
whose Absolute
Being, Parasiva,
transcends time,
form and space.
2.
We BELIEVE Lord
Siva is God,
whose immanent
nature of love,
Parasakti, is
the substratum,
primal substance
or pure
consciousness
flowing through
all form as
energy,
existence,
knowledge and
bliss.
3.
We BELIEVE Lord
Siva is God,
whose immanent
nature is the
Primal Soul,
Supreme Mahadeva,
Paramesvara,
author of Vedas
and Agamas, the
creator,
preserver and
destroyer of all
that exists.
4.
We BELIEVE in
the Mahadeva
Lord Ganesa, son
of Siva-Sakti,
to whom we must
first supplicate
before beginning
any worship or
task
5.
We BELIEVE in
the Mahadeva
Karttikeya, son
of Siva-Sakti,
whose vel of
grace dissolves
the bondages of
ignorance
6.
We BELIEVE that
each individual
soul is created
by Lord Siva and
is identical to
Him, and that
this identity
will be fully
realized by all
souls when the
bondage of anava,
karma and maya
is removed by
His grace.
7.
We BELIEVE in
three worlds of
existence: the
Bhuloka, where
souls take on
physical bodies;
the Antarloka,
where souls take
on astral
bodies; and the
Sivaloka, where
souls exist in
their own
self-effulgent
form
8.
We BELIEVE in
the law of Karma
— that one must
reap the effects
of all actions
he has caused —
and that each
soul continues
to reincarnate
until all karmas
are resolved and
moksha,
liberation, is
attained.
9.
We BELIEVE that
the performance
of charya,
virtuous living,
kriya, temple
worship, and
yoga, leading to
Parasiva through
grace of the
living satguru,
is absolutely
necessary to
bring forth
jnana, wisdom
10.
We BELIEVE that
there is no
intrinsic evil.
11.
We BELIEVE that
religion is the
harmonious
working together
of the three
worlds and that
this harmony can
be created
through temple
worship, wherein
the beings of
all three worlds
can communicate.
12.
We BELIEVE in
the Panchakshara
Mantra, the five
sacred syllables
“Namah Sivaya,”
as Saivism's
foremost and
essential
mantra.”
http://www.siddha.com.my/saivism.html
Compare this
with the Nicean
Creed of the
Chrsitian
Churches outside
of India in
which one of the
Indian delegate
also was
present.
The Nicean Creed
"
We believe in
one God, the
Father
All-sovereign,
maker of heaven
and earth, and
of all things
visible and
invisible.
We believe in
one Lord Jesus
Christ, and the
only-begotten
Son of God,
Begotten of the
Father before
all the ages,
Light of Light,
true God of true
God, begotten
not made, of one
substance with
the Father,
through whom all
things were
made; who for us
men and for our
salvation came
down from the
heavens, and was
made flesh of
the Holy Spirit
and the Virgin
Mary, and became
man, and was
crucified for us
under Pontius
Pilate, and
suffered and was
buried, and rose
again on the
third day
according to the
Scriptures, and
ascended into
the heavens, and
sits on the
right hand of
the Father, and
comes again with
glory to judge
living and dead,
of whose kingdom
there shall be
no end.
We believe in
the Holy Spirit,
the Lord and the
Life-giver, that
proceeds from
the Father, who
with the Father
and Son is
worshipped
together and
glorified
together, who
spoke through
the prophets.
We believe in
one holy
catholic and
apostolic
church.
We acknowledge
one baptism unto
remission of
sins.
We look for a
resurrection of
the dead, and
the life of the
age to come. “
What is
expressed in
both the creeds
are identitical
and we know that
this was the
faith that
existed until
the third and
fourth
centuaries in
India when the
idol worship
became prevalent
and the inner
core of faith
was lost to the
general public.
“Taproot
of the Hindu
religion:
-
Doctrine of
Avatar - God
becoming a
man in order
to redeem
human
beings.
(Unborn
Prime God
was born in
order to
give us
eternal
pleasure)
-
Trinity or
Triune
doctrine -
God in
triune stage
- Appan,
Ammai, Makan
(Saivism);
Siva,
Vishnu,
Brahma (Vaishnavism)
-
Doctrine of
fulfillment
of sacrifice
- The
offering of
sacrifice
has ceased
even though
there is
sacrificial
altar in the
temple.
People do
not offer
sacrifice
while they
worship God.
-
Doctrine of
forgiveness
of sin -
There is
forgiveness
for the sins
of human
beings by
the grace of
God and this
doctrine is
totally
controversial
to the
saying that
‘the
actions of
one person
would
definitely
yield its
fruits’.
-
Doctrine of
bhakthi -
Appreciating
the bhakthi
which is in
ones heart
irrespective
of one’s
appearance,
color,
culture etc.
(Kannappa
Nayanar)
“
The Revival
Movement of
Dravidian
Religion
Dr. M.
Deivanayagam,
Dr. D. Devakala
Pillayar Concept
In the savite
trinity of Appan,
Amma and Makan –
while the
concept of Appan
(Father), Amma (
Sakthi – Holy
spirit) and
Makan ( Son) we
oftern confront
the son in the
form of the
Elephant.
Pillaiyar is
depicted as Gana
Pathy which in
itself simply
means Lord or
Saviour of
People –
Emmanuel. Yet
the Elephant
figure have come
to dominate the
religious
ceremonies.
Though it blows
off the stretch
of imagination,
this was a
natural
development of
the concept of
incarnation. It
is a
sybolisation the
“The only
begotten Son of
God” as the
following
research
indicates.
In “The Wonder
that is
Pillaiyarpatti”
Sivashankar
Chandrasekaran
describes this
original concept
thus:
Pillaiyarpatti
is a small town
twelve
kilometers from
Karaikudi, near
Madurai, in the
Sivagangi
District of
Tamil Nadu. The
town is named
after the Ganesa
Temple that
adorns it.
Here, Lord
Ganesa is known
as Pillaiyar,
Tamil for
revered and
noble son, and 'Karpaga
Vinayakar', Lord
who offers his
blessings like
the celestial
tree Kalpaka
whose specialty
is ' you ask and
it will be
given'.
This temple is
1,600 years
old. It
contains
fourteen stone
inscriptions
dated between
400 AD and 1238
AD that reveal
that the place
was known as 'Ekkattur',
'Thiruveengaikudi',
'Maruthankudi'
and 'Raja
Narayanapuram'
before it became
to be called
Pillaiyarpatti.
An inscription
dated 1284 AD,
on the right
side wall of the
Thiruveesar
sanctum,
suggests that
the original
name of the
Ganesa was 'Desi
Vinayaga
Pillaiyar',
Pillaiyarpatti
Temple is a rock
cut temple. The
image of Karpaga
Vinayakar and
that of a Siva
Linga were
carved out of
stone by a
sculptor called
'Ekkattur Koon
Peruparanan' who
put his
signature on a
stone
inscription
found even today
in the sanctum.
He put his name
in the ' Tamizhi
language' which
was in use
between 2nd
and 5th
century AD. It
can concluded
that the icon of
Karpaga
Vinayakar must
have been carved
around 4th
century AD

|
This is an
image of the
rock cut
Karpaka
Vinayakar
Shrine at
Pillayarpatti near
Karaikkudi
at one of
the oldest
Cave Temples
(Rock Cut)
temples of
Tamilnadu.
Pillayarpatti
is situated
between
Pudukkottai
and
Karaikkudi. |

Karpaga
Vinayakar is one
of the oldest
Vinayakar images
in the world for
it has only two
arms. The
significance of
the two arms is
that the first
god evolved by
ancient man was
in the shape of
man. This male
god created out
of stone was
called Yaksha
and the female
god was called
Yakshi. Later
on to show the
superiority of
god to man the
head of the man
was removed and
in its place a
head in the
shape of OM was
fixed. The OM
head was similar
to that of an
elephant. There
are only two
images of
Vinayakars with
two arms in the
world. One is
at
Pillaiyarpatti
the other is in
Afghanistan.
The one at
Afghanistan must
have been made
later, for it is
in a standing
posture and has
a number of
ornaments
adorning it.
The one at
Pillaiyarpatti
is in a sitting
posture
mediating. He
does not have
Modakam (the
most favourite
sweet of
Pillaiyar) but a
Siva Linga in
his palm. He
mediates for the
well being of
the people and
so their prayers
are answered
immediately.
Both Arjuna and
Krishna
worshipped Him
and obtained
favors from Him.
In the Ramayana
too we come
across several
references to
Him. Sage
Valmiki depicted
Ravana, the
demon king and
chief villain of
the epic, as a
great
devotee and
daily worshipper
of Lord Shiva.
It is believed
that worship of
His icons was
widely prevalent
as early as 2nd
or 3rd Century
B.C.,.
The concept of
Son of God is
clearly
indicated in
this icon
represention
where the word
Om is
superimposed on
the Formless
Form of Sivlinga
to represent the
incarnate God
who mediates
between God and
Man. God
reaching down to
man.
Heb 10:5
Wherefore when
he cometh into
the world, he
saith, Sacrifice
and offering
thou wouldest
not, But a
body didst
thou prepare
for me;
In fact the
similarity goes
much deeper as
explained in
detail by Dr.
Devakala in
Theological
Foundation of
Hindu Religion
(http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/1412/theology.html
)
”Saivism and
Saiva Sittantha
The devotional
literature of
the Bhakthi
movement is
known as 'Panniru
Thirumurai' and
the fourteen
Sastras of the
theological
exposition are
known as 'Saiva
Sittanta Sastras'.
Sivagnanapotham
by Meykanta
Tevar is
regarded as the
basic text of
the Saiva
Sittanta Sastras.
The Saiva
Sittanta Sastras
are also known
as the Meykanta
Sastras.
Sivagnanapotham,
the basic text
of Saiva
Sitthanta
explains from
the creation of
man to
salvation.
To quote a few
examples from
the first book
of Saiva
Sittanta
Thiruvunthiar:


Neelakhanda
One who drank
the poison of
cosmos
which otherwise
would have
killed all the
living
(i) Sin
“Avan aval athu
yenum avai
moovinaimaimayin
Thotria thithiye
odungi
malaththulathaam
anthan aathi
yenmanaar
pulavar”
In the beginning
god created man
(avan), woman (aval)
and the world (athu)
in three
different
actions and they
were holy. .
But later they
fell into sin (malam)
which end the
life of holiness
and was the
beginning of sin
say the
scholars. (
Sivagnanapothan
–1)
“Muththi
mutharkodikkae
mogk kodi
padarnthu aththi
paluththathu
yenru vunthee
para appalhan
vunnaathaw
vunthee para”
Among the
creatures which
were holy, on
the first
creeper, the
creeper of sin
crept over it
and bore the
fruit of evil.
Speak this
forth. Do not
partake of that
fruit. Speak
this forth.
(ii) Avatar
'The hitherto
unknown God came
down as one of
us and gave up
Himself to save
us from evil'.
(iii) Salvation
through His
sufferings
'He who has
accomplished the
works of
salvation
through His
sufferings will
not come again
in His body, He
has no birth or
death again'.
(iv) Eternal
life
'If you join Him
who shared His
home with the
thieves you will
attain the
heavenly abode
which is light'.
Songs from other
literature are
also quoted. In
defining the
Trinity as three
persons in one
God head:
(v) Trinity and
Avatar
" The
eternal God(
Siva) and the
Ornamented one (Vitnu).
And the
eternal one on
the Lotus
(Brahma).
If examined
are one and the
same
But the ignored
are confused".
In Saivism God
is visualized in
three forms as 'Aruvam'
(God without
form), 'Uruvam'
(God with a
form) and `Aruvuruvam'
(God with
semiform).
'The Triune
Prime God'
sings Thirugnana
sampanthar in
Tevaram.
The author of
Potripahrotai
sings
"Iravaa
Inpathu Yemai
iruththa vendi
piravaa
muthalvan
piranthaan."
(To give us
eternal
pleasure, the
unborn prime God
was born). He
delivers us from
our original sin
(Sahasa malaa).
(vi) Sacrifice
The Godhead had
lost all his
glories and
offered himself
as a
'Sacrifice', so
that mankind
could be
restored to a
new life leaving
the inherent
qualities of
leading a sinful
life. In short,
he gave himself
as 'Sacrifice'
for the
remission of
sins of the
mankind. This is
sung by
Thirunavukkarasar
in Tevaram as
follows
'Aviyumaahi'
(He offered
himself as
sacrifice)
"Aviyaai
aviyumaahi
arukkamaai
Perukkamaahi
Paaviyar paavam
theerkum
paramanaai
brahmanaahi"
(He being the
sacrifice he
offered himself
as Sacrifice,
decreased yet
multiplied, he
is the
Transcending
Brahman who
washes away the
sins of the
sinners.)”
This similarity
is not
restricted to
Saivite theology
but extends to
Vaishnavite
theology as
well. Dr.
Devakala
summarises this
also:
Vaishnavism

Doctrine of
trinity,
doctrine of
avatar, and the
doctrine of
fulfillment of
sacrifice are
fundamental
doctrinal
aspects of
Vaishnavism.
(i)Trinity
'Moovaraahiya
Moorthiyai'
(Triune God)
'Moovaraahiya
Oruvanai'
(Triune person)
'Udambu
Uruvil
Moonronroi'
(One in Trinity
in the bodily
appearence).
Also He resides
in our heart
'Ullaththae
Uraiyum maal'
( The one who
resides in the
heart)
(ii)Sacrifice
'Thaanae
thanakkumavan
than uruve
evvuruvum
thaanae
Thava Vuruvum'
(He himself is
his
comparison,all
images are his
images, He
himself is the
image of
sacrifice)
'Vanakkudai
thava neri vali
ninru'
(By following
the adorable
path of the one
who sacrificed
himself )
Thavam means
'Thannuyir
thaanara
peruthal’
(offering
once own self as
sacrifice) says
Thiruvalluvar
which means
sacrificing ones
ownself.
(iii) Deliverer
There are
references about
Original Sin
(Janma bhandham)
and individual
sin (Karma
bhandham) in
Bhagavad-Gita.
And God delivers
us from these
"I will deliver
thee from all
sins"
All documentary
evidence thus
suggest that
both Saivism and
Vaishnavism are
the offshoots of
Early Indian
Christianity.
According
to Shaiva
Sidhdhaantha the
God is formless
(arUpa) . But
for the
salvation of
lives He took
the form of
lingam -
meaning symbol (arUpa
rUpa = formless
form).
lingam can
be considered
both as form as
well as formless
symbol. This
murti is called
sada shiva murti.
This Sada Shiva
murti, for the
benefit of
living beings,
took many forms
which are called
maheshwara
murtis.
Usually in the
temples, Sadha
Shiva murthi
(Shiva
lingam )
will be in the
Sanctum
Sanctorum while
the maheshwara
murthis will be
in the
Praahaaram.
(Outside the
Sanctum
Sanctorum).
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/2583/maahesh.html
Dr.
S.Radhakrishnan
defines Bhakthi
as the
"conscience
recognition of
wholehearted
response to the
source of all
goodness, the
Divine. It is in
this world, not
vows, not
pilgrimages, not
yoga practices,
not study of
Scriptures, not
sacrificial
rites, not
philosophical
discourses; only
devotion can
give us
freedom."
The basic
philosophy of
the Saiva saints
is known as
Saiva
SitthAndham. It
is believed that
pasu , living
things, can
attain the
realization of
the Supreme ,pathi,
by getting rid
of pAsam
,attachment. In
practice this is
accomplished by
concentrating
the mind on the
Supreme through
devotion and
music.
The four
components of
the Bhakthi
pathway are
therefore the
Absolute Being
or the Divine,
the paths to
attain it, the
devotion and
finally the
devotional
experience. The
Absolute Being
or the Divine
has been
referred to as
Vishnnu, by the
Vaishnavaites
and Sivan by the
Saivaites.
All the saiva
saints stress
the oneness of
the Supreme.
"For One who
does not have
any name or any
form, why not we
give thousand
different names
and hail His
greatness.”-
Manikkavachakar
Thiruthellam
Thevaram poems
Even today if
you read through
the Saiva
Sidhanta Church
teachings except
for the names,
you would not be
able to
distingusih it
from Chrisian
teachings in
almost all
matters.
Today what is
seen in Hinduism
are the Six-fold
religions based
on Siva worship
and are linked
through the
names of the
family
relationship of
Siva. According
to mythology,
Siva has two
sons through
Sakthi and two
sons through
Vishnu and
totally seven
members are
mentioned in the
family of Siva.
They are Siva,
Sakthi,
Kumarakkatavul,
Pillaiyar,
Vishnu, Brahma
and Ayyappa.
Amongst the
seven, Brahma
was cast away as
a cheat and a
liar, and
according to
tradition there
should not be
any temple or
worship or
religion in the
name of Brahma.
Discarding
Brahma, there
are six
religions in the
names of the
rest, and thus
the name
Six-fold
religion.1
Siva's roots are
from Isa, but
today the
religion is
highly corrupted
and
syncretised.
In the 8th c A.D,
Adi Sankara
amalgamated the
Six-fold
religions,
Saivism,
Vaishnavism,
Saktham,
Gaumaram,
Ganapathyam and
Sauram, by using
monism
and the
caste system.
His motive was
to pave the way
for the
supremacy of the
Aryan Purohitas
under the guise
of religion.
Since Adi
Sankara's time,
the people of
India and the
world have been
deceived by the
Aryan Purohitas
that they are
the forefathers
of Hinduism.
They portrayed
Hinduism as
being very
ancient
originating from
the Vedas and
the mother of
all religions.
The Vedas have
absolutely
nothing to do
with today's
Hinduism, the
deities of the
Vedas lost
significance in
the 1st
c AD when
Christianity
entered India.
Over the years
history has been
warped and
evidences
destroyed to
hide these
facts. However,
in these last
days God is
exposing these
lies
and enabling His
people to tear
down all the
false
foundations.
In the West, the
Church today is
similarly being
threatened by
the
New Age
movement. Satan
used
Monism
and
Cycle of Birth
to enslave the
early Indian
Church and these
are the key
deceptions of
the New Age
movement.
Extracted from
'108 Questions
to Sankara
Mutt', by Dr. M.
Deivanayagam,
The Revival
Movement of
Dravidian
Religion,
Chennai, India.
The architecture
of the ancient
churches bears
witness to this
fact.
In the early
period the
Christians of
Kerala seem to
have built their
churches after
the model of
Hindu temples,
as is evidenced
by the alleged
action of Vasco-da-Gama
in entering a
Kali temple at
Calicut
mistaking it for
a Christian
church. They
adopted for
their churches
the temple plan
comprised of a
four-sided
sanctuary with a
large pillared
hall in the
front. The
church had also
a tower which,
like the
Sikhara
above the
Garbhagriha
of the temple,
soared to the
maximum height.
The indigenous
tradition which
influenced
church
architecture
continued
without break
till the coming
of the
Portuguese in
1498 AD. As part
of their policy
of Latinisation
of the Church is
Kerala, the
Portuguese
introduced
innovations in
the design of
church
buildings.
Department of
Public
Relations,
Government of
Kerala
http://www.prd.kerala.gov.in/prd2/art/architec.htm