Hinduism as we
know today is the product of syncretic
combination of various Philosophical and
religious thoughts of the day. The major
formative force was indeed Christianity.
When the Harappa civilization was unearthed,
linguists from all over the world were hard at
work to decipher the scripts. I have met some of
them back in 1950 while in school. The baffling
thing was those writing were far removed from
“Indo-European” scripts. All attempts to
decipher in terms of Indo-European languages
failed while it yielded fair results even in
those days using Kodum Tamil as base. Evidently
there existed a language system which was far
more ancient than Sanskrit.
The Grantha writing system was developed in the
5th c. AD and was the protolanguage of the
modern Tamil and was used to write Sanskrit.
Inscriptions in Early Grantha, dating from the
5th to 6th c. AD on copper plates and stone
monuments were found dating from the Period of
the Pal lavas near Chennai (Madras). Originally
Grantha was used for writing Sanskrit. Nagiri
came into use only after the 7th c. AD.
Nirad Chaudhuri points out that 'the Hindu
religious texts with the exception of the Vedas
and their ancillary treatises, are all in
classical Sanskrit. He says that in their
present form none would be earlier than the
fourth century A.D'. Though it is often argued
that these epic and philosophical works were in
existence long before they were written down and
were handed down through generations by oral
transmission, it is quite unlikely because at
some point the translation occurred from Vedic
to Grantha or to Sanskrit. Hence its original
form or content cannot be guaranteed. It is
quite likely that the form and content changed
during this period as it does even today (in
spite of the writing)
'The Gita is written in good classical Sanskrit,
and epigraphic evidence clearly shows that the
Gita could not have been written before the
second century A.D.’ It is probably of much
later period.
'The earliest epigraphic evidence on languages
employed in India comes from the inscriptions of
Asoka inscribed in third century B.C. Asoka took
care that his messages were intelligible to all
and he used a particular kind of Prakrit. He
even translated his messages to Greek and
Aramaic. But, there are no inscriptions in
Sanskrit. The first evidence of Sanskrit is seen
around A.D.150 and from the fifth century A.D.
and classical Sanskrit is seen to be the
dominant language in these inscriptions.'
It is evident therefore that the early Vedic
religion underwent a drastic change during the
period following the 2nd c, which culminated,
into the various vedantic teachings, which we
know today as Hinduism.
The major political influence of the period soon
before the period was the invasions of Greek.
Alexander the great
The invasion did succeed to a certain extent.
Seleucidan kingdom was established in part of
India that was conquered. Subsequently, several
Greek kingdoms came into existence in the
Punjab/Multan/Afghan regions. One of the most
famous Greek kings was Menander. Menander was
scholar in Buddhism. Greek and Indian art fused
and gave rise to a new art form called Gandara.
It was the Greeks (philosophical form by Plato
and the Pythagoreans) who first introduced the
idea of reincarnation to India. It does not
appear in the earliest Hindu scriptures (the Rig
Veda) but was developed at a later period in the
Upanishads under the Greek influence.
Among the Indo-Parthian Empire was the Kingdom
of Gondophorus in Taxila, which played an
important part in shaping the religious history
of India. It was Gondophorus who summoned
St.Thomas into India who arrived in the Malabar
Coast in AD 52. St. Thomas’ route of
evangelization can be traced from the Acts of
Thomas written around AD 300. Here is the
approximate route.
The culmination of Upanishadic teachings
actually came in by the 7th to 10th
C AD when these were really crystallized.
Though each of the schools of Vedanta claim
heritage from Godhead himself and claims its
parampara through rshi tradition to manava
parampara, the real exposition are found only in
the Acharyas who lived in the period later than
7th c AD. Here are the founders of
the Theistic schools of Vedanta and their
approximate times:
Sankara 788 –820 Advaita – Monism (Born in
Kaladi, Kerala)
Ramanuja 1017-1137 Visistadvaita the Modified
Non-dualist school. (Ramanuja (also known as
Ilaya Perumal) was born to Kesava Perumal
Somayaji Dikhsitar and Kanthimathi Ammal at
Sriperum pudur. He was born in Kaliyuga year
4119 which corresponds to1017 AD)
Madhva (Ananda Tirtha) 1197-1273 Dvaita the
Dualist school.
Nimbarka late C13? (Nimbarka was born of Aruna
Muni and Jayanti Devi on the banks of Godavari
river)
Dvaitadvaita the Dualist-non-dualist school.
Vallabha 1478-1530 Shudda Advaita- the Pure
Advaita school.
Caitanya 1485-1533 followed by Baladeva early
18thc: AcintyaBhedabheda - Incomprehensible
Distinction-Non-distinctionism.
Here is the Geographical settings of these
teachers.

It will probably come as a surprise that the two
maps overlaps exactly on each other.
The only plausible explanation is that Vedic
religion was transformed into Hinduism as we
have come to know of by the reaction to two
other religio-philosophical systems – Greek and
Christian. We have very little history of the
growth and decay of these religious thoughts in
documentation. However we know that there was a
powerful Christian presence in the Cauvery Area
apart from the Christian Church in Malankara
(Malabar). As the Christian faith became
powerful, there had been local reaction from the
religions that were present. Natural course of
events produced various syncretic form along
with direct persecution. We know that there
ensued a persecution to these Christian
communities in the Andhra and Tamil areas, that
they were forced to migrate to Quilon and
Thiruvanthapuram in Kerala. We also know that
they were perused by the then leaders of
Hinduism. Christian documentation indicate that
a certain sorcerer Manicavachagar actually came
down to Quilon and reconverted 70 families back
to Hindu fold. Who actually is this
Manicavacagar cannot be posotively identified.
It is normally assumed that this was the famous
Gnostic Persian Prince Manicaen. It could very
well have been a Hindu Theosophist of the
period. It would be worthwhile to remember that
a Gnostic controversy was at its climax in the
Eastern Churches at that time. Gnostic and
Greek influence syncretised with the Christian
doctrines actually produced the present day
Hinduism. We can see exactly the same history
repeated in the reconversion of tribal
Christians.
An impassionate analysis will reveal the
underlying syncretic layers.
Thus Apium Forum remarks ”When we study the
development of religion and worship in India,
before and after Christ, we can see that Christ
and Christianity totally transformed religion
and worship in India from the first century AD.
Saivism first developed as a monotheistic
doctrine and Siva was first called Isa which is
the name for Jesus in the North. The avatar
concept (God coming into the world in the form
of a man) in Vaishnavism is the influence of
Christianity.
Hindus in India consider Christianity as a
foreign religion. However they do not realize
how much early Indian Christianity has developed
and molded their own religion, and, the revealed
truths in their own faith point to Jesus Christ.
I pray that we the Christians in India would
take time to understand where the heart of every
Hindu is, and, help guide them to The Truth in
Christ Jesus by gently removing the barriers and
obstacles without
Dr. D Devakala and Dr. Alexander Harris has
shown this development in the following time
line. On this can be added the St.Thomas
history when the picture will be more clear.
This is shown below:













http://www.geocities.com\Athens\Parthenon\2104\index.html
Evidently the Hinduism as we know of today was
the product of various religious and
philosophical thoughts of the late Christian
Era. Among these were the Bhakthi marga and the
centrality of the Ultimate Incarnation in the
person of Isa (Yesu) as preached by the
Christians. In the process, Christians were
persecuted and forcefully converted and most
churches in the interior syncretized and became
part of Sivite and Vaishnavite traditions. But
Malankara Church survived the onslaught
essentially because of their contact with the
rest of the Christian world particularly of the
Eastern churches of Persia. Most of all
Malankara had the help of the Syrian translation
of the Bible, which was earnestly taught, in the
Churches. So Malankara churches survived the
Gnostic and syncretic forces to this day.