|
Every ritual
within any
religion has
always two
components.
There is an
ongoing
evolution of
the form of
the ritual
as the
culture
changes. The
images and
the symbolic
meanings
change with
the
variations
in culture,
language,
social
setup,
political
set up etc.
There are
also the
changes in
the
understanding
of the
symbol and
ritual in
terms of
faith.
The same is
true
regarding
baptism.
There had
been changes
in the modes
of baptism
from
pre-Christian
period to
the
twenty-first
century.
There also
had been
changes in
the
understanding
of what the
ritual
stands for
and in the
prophetic
interpretation
of the
symbol in
spiritual
level and
its
interpretation
in terms of
contemporary
understanding
of God,
justification,
sanctification,
nature of
man,
redemption
etc.,
Rituals were
normal part
all
religions.
It has been
always a way
of living.
In fact all
religions
try to
penetrate
deep into
the daily
living,
giving it a
meaning
beyond the
mundane.
Temples were
always the
center of
the
community.
It ought to
be. Daily
ablutionary
rites were
common among
all
religions.
The author
of Hebrews
refers to
these as
Doctrines of
baptisms,
which
according to
the writer
were
prophetic
indications
of
redemption
through
Christ.
Bodily
cleanliness
is
indicative
of spiritual
cleanliness.
It is a
symbol. God
must be
approached
with a clean
body. Hence
baths
ritualized
as baptisms
were
ordained. A
direct
equivalence
can be found
between the
Hebrew and
Hindu
ablutions
and its
relation to
worship.
These
ablutions
were always
taken to
change the
status of a
person from
unclean to
clean or
from impure
to pure.
Thus priests
in all
religions
took
elaborate
baths and
made prayers
before
entering the
sanctum.
Even common
people
followed
similar
ritual baths
before going
to worship.
Worshipping
with wet
clothes or
in water up
to their
waist came
be a form of
repentance
and
prayachitta
– penitence.
Quaran
speaks of
Eve standing
in the river
with water
upto her
waist for
days in
repentance
for her
disobedience.
The
tradition
can be found
still among
the Hindu
women. It
has remained
with
Christians
in added
vigor with
"Sunday
best".
Initiation
into the
religion of
the fathers
was always
performed
within the
first few
days.
Initiation
expresses
what the
community
believes
about its
identity and
sense of
belonging.
To
comprehend
the meaning
of
initiation
rites of a
given
historical
period, the
faith
understanding
of that
period must
be examined.
History
provides the
facts;
theology
interprets
those facts
with a faith
understanding.
Therefore,
this
overview
will present
the
historical
development
of the rite
of baptism
as well as
the Church's
faith
understanding
about that
sacrament.
Every
religious
ritual has
three
dimensions.
The mundane
material
dimension is
the actual
external
rite.
Then we have
the
spiritual
dimension,
which is not
visible, but
is assumed
to be the
more real
act. The
material is
the
reflection
or image of
the
spiritual.
Then we have
the ultimate
fulfillment
of the
ritual,
where the
physical and
spiritual
meet and
becomes the
reality.
When we
emphasize
one
interpretation
over the
other, we
get confused
over what
the ritual
actually is
and what it
means. Let
us make sure
that these
do not mix.
They are
distinct
from each
other, yet
one in
essence.
Baptism has
these
dimensions:
* Physical:
The physical
immersion,
washing,
sprinkling
or pouring
of water.
**
Spiritual:
Repentance,
New Birth –
Born in the
Spirit,
Purification,
Baptism with
the Holy
Spirit.
** Final
Fulfillment:
Resurrection
of the Body,
recreated in
the image of
God.
The
spiritual
follows the
Physical and
then comes
the
fulfillment.
1 Cor 15: 46
The
spiritual
did not come
first, but
the natural,
and after
that the
spiritual.
47 The first
man was of
the dust of
the earth,
the second
man from
heaven. 48
As was the
earthly man,
so are those
who are of
the earth;
and as is
the man from
heaven, so
also are
those who
are of
heaven. 49
And just as
we have
borne the
likeness of
the earthly
man, so
shall we
bear the
likeness of
the man from
heaven.
The Jewish
practice of
circumcision
and water
baptism was
the
established
initiation
rites
expressing
incorporation
and
purification.
Circumcision
was the
means of
initiation
into Old
Covenant.
Cutting the
flesh was
not a new
method of
initiation.
Tribes in
Africa still
cut their
faces to
produce a
scar, which
distinguish
one tribe
from the
other. This
was indeed
important
during the
war. How
will they
know friends
from the
foes?
Circumcision
however was
unique in
that it
cannot be
seen unless
a person is
undressed
indicating
that the
circumcision
is of the
heart. This
was what
Moses and
the prophets
emphasized.
Moses said
Deut. 30: 6
The LORD
your God
will
circumcise
your hearts
and the
hearts of
your
descendants,
so that you
may love him
with all
your heart
and with all
your soul,
and live.
Jer. 4: 3
This is what
the LORD
says to the
men of Judah
and to
Jerusalem:
"Break up
your
unplowed
ground and
do not sow
among
thorns. 4
Circumcise
yourselves
to the LORD,
circumcise
your hearts,
Rom. 2: 29
No, a man is
a Jew if he
is one
inwardly;
and
circumcision
is
circumcision
of the
heart, by
the Spirit,
not by the
written
code. Such a
man's praise
is not from
men, but
from God.
Closely
associated
with baptism
was
Anointing
with Oil.
This was
also a means
of
consecration
as water
baptism was.
Anointing
with oil was
used for
consecration
of priests
as in:
Ex. 29: 5
Take the
garments and
dress Aaron
with the
tunic, the
robe of the
ephod, the
ephod itself
and the
breastpiece.
Fasten the
ephod on him
by its
skillfully
woven
waistband.
6 Put the
turban on
his head and
attach the
sacred
diadem to
the turban.
7 Take the
anointing
oil and
anoint him
by pouring
it on his
head.
8 Bring his
sons and
dress them
in tunics
-
and put
headbands
on them.
Then tie
sashes
on Aaron
and his
sons.
The
priesthood
is
theirs
by a
lasting
ordinance.
In this
way you
shall
ordain
Aaron
and his
sons.
For the
consecration
of kings as
in:
Anointing of
David by
Samuel:
1 Sam
16:12Then
the LORD
said, "Rise
and anoint
him; he is
the one."
-
So
Samuel
took the
horn of
oil and
anointed
him in
the
presence
of his
brothers,
and from
that day
on the
Spirit
of the
LORD
came
upon
David in
power.
Anointing of
Nimshi by
Elijah:
1 Ki. 19: 16
Also, anoint
Jehu son of
Nimshi king
over Israel,
and anoint
Elisha son
of Shaphat
from Abel
Meholah to
succeed you
as prophet.
2 Ki 9: 6
Jehu got up
and went
into the
house. Then
the prophet
(Elisha)
poured the
oil on
Jehu's head
and
declared,
"This is
what the
LORD, the
God of
Israel,
says: 'I
anoint you
king over
the Lord's
people
Israel.
The above
verse also
indicates
that
anointing
with oil was
also used in
the
consecration
of Prophets.
The
traditional
way of
anointing
with oil was
pouring oil
from a Ram
Horn over
the head of
the anointed
so that it
flowed from
his head all
over as a
covering
like a
raiment.
By the time
of exodus
proselytes
were given
the baptism
by allowing
the
catechumen
enter into a
large
gathering of
water
(mikvah) to
the level of
his naval.
Some modern
Jewish
groups
insists on
baptism by
squatting
preliminary
to the
circumcision.
In this
ritual, the
proselyte
was asked to
enter a
flowing
stream of
water and
squat down
and immerse
himself with
his eye lids
fluttering
and fingers
and toes
twisting
concentrating
on God. This
was
witnessed by
at least two
elders who
vouched for
the proper
baptism
ritual. The
catechumen
is then
considered
as newly
born and is
given the
circumcision
after eight
days.
In the
Essene Way,
baptism was
a central
concept in
terms of
holiness.
They were
essentially
a Yvhist
cult. They
looked
forward to
the coming
of the
Righteous
one and
foretold
prophetically
about the
suffering
and
crucifixion
of the
messiah. I
assume that
this has
caused a
change in
the ritual
of baptism
as practiced
by the
Essenes – at
least in
certain
groups of
Essenes.
Their
baptism was
not by
immersion.
The
catechumen
entered the
flowing
water to
waist deep
and another
person
poured water
over him and
took him as
his
disciple.
This is was
an anointing
or
consecration
into
discipleship.
The method
therefore
combined
both the
water
baptism as
well as
anointing.
They were
entering
into a new
community
where each
one was a
priest,
prophet and
a king. The
water
represented
the
repentance
and pouring
represented
new
clothing.
There is
strong
evidence
that John
the Baptist
and Jesus
were
involved in
this group.
John’s
baptism
therefore
followed
this method.
This is
certainly
relevant
because
John’s
message was
that the
"Kingdom of
God is at
hand". He
was making
way for the
messiah and
his baptism
therefore
followed the
traditional
Essenic
ritual. John
the Baptist
introduced
from Judaic
and Essenic
traditions,
the baptism
of
repentance
leading to
the
forgiveness
of sins and
preparation
for the
coming
messianic
age. This he
did by
disciplining
them and
teaching
them. The
modern
disciples of
John, the
Mandaens
follow this
mode of
baptism.
They also
follow rigid
ablutionary
practices as
of the
Pharisees.
It is
probable
that there
were other
sects within
the Essenic
tradition
with other
forms of
baptism. It
would be
presumptive
to assert
that there
was only one
scriptural
form. Early
church must
have
borrowed
freely from
these forms.
They
probably did
not give
much thought
about the
"legality of
the mode".
When Jesus
appeared
before John,
the baptism
took the
meaning of
anointing to
be prophet,
priest and
king to
fulfil the
mosaic
regulation –
to fulfil
all
righteousness.
Jesus was
indeed a
prophet, a
priest and
the rightful
heir to the
throne of
David. So
the baptism
was the
legal
consecration
of these
positions.
There was
this element
of
forgiveness
of sin,
which
bothers many
Christians
when it
comes to
Jesus. We
need to
differentiate
between
personal
sins and
sins that we
bear for
being in the
society.
Every member
of the human
society
bears the
responsibility
of all evil
that
perpetuates
in human
society.
Jesus was
bore this as
a human and
carried this
to the
cross. It
was the
struggle
against
these that
led Jesus to
the Cross.
Every
Christian is
expected to
bear this
cross unto
death.
Jesus used
the word
baptism only
in reference
to his
suffering,
death and
resurrection.
Baptism for
Jesus meant
Cross-. Any
Christian
baptism that
does not
bear this
symbolism is
not real
baptism as
seen by
Jesus.
Christian
baptism is
also a
statement of
resurrection
and newness
of life,
clothing
with
righteousness
etc. The
early Church
used baptism
to express
one's faith
conversion
and
rebirth-recreation
into the
Body of
Christ.
During the
initial
Apostolic
Period,
greater
emphasis was
placed on
adult
conversion/initiation.
But Jewish
regulations
did agree to
the
conversion
of the
infants and
minors even
without
their
consent by
proper
immersion.
The concept
was that
minors are
brought up
within the
faith of the
head of the
family. They
were
permitted to
repudiate it
when they
reach the
age of
maturity,
which were
13 in the
Jewish
tradition.
Religion was
always a
matter of
family and
not
individual.
Deities were
always
family
deities –
Kula Daivam.
In fact the
Yahvite
tradition
was that God
was the God
of Israel,
not of the
individuals,
not even of
families. We
see this
picture in
the story of
Jacob and
Laban.
Rachel stole
the family
idols. Each
family in
the period
judges had
their own
Puja rooms
with their
own pujarees
– either of
Levitical
tribe or
elsewhere.
Individuals
can choose
to go to a
specific god
for specific
purposes.
These are
Sadhanas,
personal
choices for
special
specific
reasons. By
the time of
Jesus these
idols and
personal
deities were
angels. The
book of
Hebrews
takes up the
matter and
shows how
Jesus is
much greater
than angel.
The concept
of what is
the unit of
mankind has
undergone
drastic
change.
These old
concepts
still linger
in our
thoughts and
actions. The
early unit
was the
nation.
People still
think of a
nation as
Hindu,
Christian or
Muslim.
Early in
history only
one religion
was
permitted
within the
nation. All
those who
disagreed
over their
god were
considered
as lower
class. They
were taxed
heavily or
treated as
servants and
slaves. The
normal laws
governing
the nation
will not be
binding on
them. The
vestige of
this can be
seen in most
Islamic
nations
today. Old
Testament
also bears
testimony to
this
difference.
As an
example a
Hebrew
brother will
get his
freedom from
slavery
after
serving
seven years
while others
do not.
Hence when
God ordered
Israel to
take
possession
of the land
they were
told to
destroy all
local
people. One
Empire, One
Faith was
the theme of
Roman Empire
Later the
unit became
the tribes.
Later it
became the
household.
The
household
included
husband
wife, but
any parents,
children and
their
families and
slaves and
their
families.
The
disintegration
of the
household
led to the
nuclear
family units
including
only the
husband,
wife and
children who
are not
married.
Further
disintegration
during this
generation
has limited
it to
couples or
even to
individuals.
When the
head of the
unit accepts
a religion,
it was
normally
considered
the religion
of the unit
as a whole.
Yvh was the
God of
Israel the
whole twelve
tribes of
Israel. If
any man
married
outside of
Israel the
girl left
her religion
and took up
the religion
of the
husband. The
problem of
inter
religious
marriage is
still the
same. This
unit of
society
concept is
reflected in
baptism
also. In the
early
church, when
the head of
the
household
was
converted to
Christian
faith, the
entire
household
was
baptized.
The whole
family was
later given
instruction
into the
faith and
was
confirmed.
Although all
members of
the
household
were
baptized,
not all were
given the
full
membership
of the
Church. Only
those who
were
confirmed
was given
the
privilege of
joining the
table or
could take
up offices.
Whatever be
the
controversy
about
baptism be
it was
always
understood
that
confirmation
was by the
lying on of
hands. As
society
became
fragmented
because of
individualism,
the unit
became
individuals.
Even within
a marriage,
it is not
unusual to
find the
husband and
wife
practicing
totally
different
religions.
This was
never
acceptable
within the
household
norm. It was
the usual
practice in
all
countries to
excommunicate
such people
from the
society. In
Islamic
nations this
is still
practiced.
In fact they
were tried
as heretics
and executed
appropriately.
During the
reformation
period both
the Catholic
and the
Protestant
Churches did
the same
thing.
Early Church
living in
the period
when
"household
was the
unit",
invariably
used the
household as
their unit
and baptized
the entire
household as
is reported
in the Acts
of Apostles.
Wrangling
over whether
they
contained
infants or
not is just
splitting
hair over
the issue.
Even in
places where
it is not
mentioned
explicitly
it is
understood
as such in
context.
This is
because the
early church
understood
baptism not
as a rite of
full
membership
but as an
initiation.
This was
supported by
the concept
that this
was the New
Covenant,
which was
the
spiritual
part of the
Old
Covenant.
Just as Old
Covenant
symbol of
circumcision
was given to
the entire
household,
the symbol
of New
Covenant
also was
given to the
entire
household.
Acts of
Apostles do
not give us
any instance
where the
catechumens
were given
any period
of
instruction
apart from
the first
message of
salvation.
However
during the
later period
a short
period of
preparation
was probably
introduced
to avoid
infiltration
of spies
into the
Church
during the
intense
persecution
period that
followed. By
the time of
Hippolytus
(c. AD
170-236) an
elaborate
system of
probation
for
catechumens
had been
invented, as
expressed in
the
Apostolic
Tradition
[Latin
edition by
E. Hauler,
Leipzig,
1900],
Gregory Dix,
ed.,
(London:
SPCK, 1937).
Full
membership
was
conferred at
all times by
the laying
on of hands
after the
Church was
sure of the
standing of
the
individual.
Even today
our liturgy
reflects
this aspect.
The first
part of the
Sunday
worship
(today
called the
First Part:
`Liturgy of
the Word')
was open to
all. It
starts with
adoration,
prayers,
supplications,
reading of
the Word and
ends with
offering and
the Ministry
of the Word.
Following
this portion
of the
service they
were
dismissed
while fully
initiated
members
remained to
celebrate
the
Eucharist.
As for the
formal form
of baptism,
early Jewish
Christians
must have
simply
continued
the baptism,
which the
Apostles
were giving
during the
ministry of
Jesus before
the cross
and
resurrection.
That is the
only way we
can
understand
the casual
order of
Great
commission.
Jesus never
instituted
baptism.
Jesus
himself
followed the
John’s mode
of
disciplining
and we see a
direct
comparison
between the
two in
John’s
gospel. We
are told
that Jesus
was
baptizing
more
disciples
than John.
The number
of disciples
was the only
difference.
Initially
the Way was
restricted
to Jews and
therefore
they already
had the
circumcision.
When the
gentiles
joined the
Way, the
question
arose
whether they
were to have
circumcision
and water
baptism.
Since
Christianity
was
considered
as Jewish
cult, early
Christians
demanded the
gentiles to
become Jews
and then
receive the
baptism into
the way.
Hence we
should
suppose that
the baptism
given was
identical in
nature to
conversion
baptism or
variation in
accordance
with
messianic
perspective.
It was at
the council
of Jerusalem
the
Christian
community
came to the
realization
that the
church was
universal
and the Way
was not just
another
Jewish cult.
Baptism took
a new
meaning. It
would be a
simplification
to say that
baptism was
always
performed in
exactly same
way because
now both the
Jewish
traditions,
Essene
traditions
and the
gentile
traditions
contributed
to the
forms. I
should
expect that
different
modes were
used
appropriate
to the
occasion.
The Way was
not
ritualistic.
"For freedom
Christ has
set you
free" was
the constant
reminder and
its
corresponding
inner
transformations
and
experience
replaced the
outward
rituals. The
flesh was of
no avail. I
should
expect that
baptism was
performed,
standing,
squatting,
immersing,
pouring,
sprinkling
or even
without
water with
hand. The
mode was
secondary.
However it
is unlikely
that
immersing
backward was
ever
employed in
any baptism
– Christian,
Jewish or
Gentile. –
until the
1500s.
Making
disciples
was the
purpose.
Whether they
were washed
then or
later did
not really
matter.
But as the
Church
became the
official
religion of
Rome and
institutionalized,
the leaders
became
powerful,
rituals
returned and
insistence
of form
without
content
began to
return.
Baptism
became the
fashion of
the period.
The few who
opposed were
forced into
it because
that was the
religion of
the Empire.
Baptism by
total
immersion
became
popular
during this
period.
Historical
records
indicate
that
hundreds of
citizens
were marched
into rivers
and baptized
in Rome.
About AD 300
the whole
kingdom of
Armenia
became
Christian
under King
Tiridates
III. In AD
486 King
Clovis of
the Franks
was baptized
along with
three
thousand of
his
soldiers. A
hundred
years later
St.
Augustine
and his
monks
baptized
King
Ethelbert of
Kent
together
with
thousand of
Saxons. In
AD 955 five
thousand
Magyars of
Hungary were
baptized and
the country
became
Christian,
under King
Stephen.
Then came
Poland
became
Christian
under Prince
Mieczyslaw
and Russia
under
Emperor
Vladimir. In
the eleventh
century King
Olave of
Norway was
baptized and
that country
became
Christian.
That is how
Christianity
became the
major
religion of
Europe. In
Africa and
India, the
process was
similar.
Acta Thoma
presents the
story of
St.Thomas in
the courts
of Kings and
Perumals and
was
essentially
directed to
the families
the Brahmin
teachers
called
Namboothiris.
First
Malabar
church
consisted of
seven and
half units
of Church
with ten
families per
unit along
with the
migrant
Jewish
families of
Cochin. The
first Bishop
was Prince
Peter of the
Jewish
settlement.
After the
initial
baptism
Thomas left
for North
India and
returned to
complete his
disciplining.
Baptizing
the infants
as part of
the
household
prevailed
from the
early church
period. This
was the
Jewish
tradition.
Talmud
specifically
mentions the
justification
of child
conversion
baptism as
beneficiary
to the
covenant.
Baptism was
never
considered
as anything
other than
an
initiation
into
discipleship
as the Great
Commission
suggested.
The major
impetus of
infant
baptism grew
out of a
response to
a fifth
century
theological
controversy.
Against a
growing
heresy that
Adam's sin
had no
consequence
on the rest
of
humankind,
St.
Augustine
emphasized
the
transmission
of original
sin through
inheritance.
Infant
baptism was
emphasized
as a means
of washing
away the
original sin
inherited
from Adam.
It was the
impact of
Augustine's
theology
that
initiated
the view of
baptism as
the
sacrament
for the
forgiveness
of original
sin rather
than
incorporation
into the
Body of
Christ.
Certainly a
better
theological
justification
for infant
baptism was
articulated
by St. John
Chrysostom
in the
fourth
century:
"...in
baptism they
(infants)
are given
justice and
inheritance
of the grace
to be
members of
Christ and
dwellings of
the Holy
Spirit."
He argued
that
although
infants were
not capable
of a
personal
faith, the
faith of the
Church
supplied it
for them.
Theology
continued to
strongly
emphasize
that the
sacrament
removed the
stain of
original
sin. By the
fifteenth
century
baptism was
defined as
the
sacrament
"through
which an
infant is
rescued from
the devil's
power and
adopted as
God's
child." The
theology
thus
complicated
the simple
act of
infant
baptism into
a magic and
mystery. |